Auto-segmentation of thoraco-abdominal organs in pediatric dynamic MRI
AKHTAR, Y.; UDUPA, J. K.; Tong, Y.; LIU, T.; WU, C.; KOGAN, R.; AL-NOURY, M.; Hosseini, M.; TONG, L.; Mannikeri, S. B.; ODHNER, D.; MCDONOUGH, J. M.; LOTT, C.; CLARK, A.; CAHILL, P. J.; ANARI, J. B.; TORIGIAN, D. A.
Show abstract
PurposeAnalysis of the abnormal motion of thoraco-abdominal organs in respiratory disorders such as the Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome (TIS) and scoliosis such as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) or early onset scoliosis (EOS) can lead to better surgical plans. We can use healthy subjects to find out the normal architecture and motion of a rib cage and associated organs and attempt to modify the patients deformed anatomy to match to it. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is a practical and preferred imaging modality for capturing dynamic images of healthy pediatric subjects. In this paper, we propose an auto-segmentation set-up for the lungs, kidneys, liver, spleen, and thoraco-abdominal skin in these dMRI images which have their own challenges such as poor contrast, image non-standardness, and similarity in texture amongst gas, bone, and connective tissue at several inter-object interfaces. MethodsThe segmentation set-up has been implemented in two steps: recognition and delineation using two deep neural network (DL) architectures (say DL-R and DL-D) for the recognition step and delineation step, respectively. The encoder-decoder framework in DL-D utilizes features at four different resolution levels to counter the challenges involved in the segmentation. We have evaluated on dMRI sagittal acquisitions of 189 (near-)normal subjects. The spatial resolution in all dMRI acquisitions is 1.46 mm in a sagittal slice and 6.00 mm between sagittal slices. We utilized images of 89 (10) subjects at end inspiration for training (validation). For testing we experimented with three scenarios: utilizing (1) the images of 90 (=189-89-10) different (remaining) subjects at end inspiration for testing, (2) the images of the aforementioned 90 subjects at end expiration for testing, and (3) the images of the aforesaid 99 (=89+10) subjects but at end expiration for testing. In some situations, we can take advantage of already available ground truth (GT) of a subject at a particular respiratory phase to automatically segment the object in the image of the same subject at a different respiratory phase and then refining the segmentation to create the final GT. We anticipate that this process of creating GT would require minimal post hoc correction. In this spirit, we conducted separate experiments where we assume to have the ground truth of the test subjects at end expiration for scenario (1), end inspiration for (2), and end inspiration for (3). ResultsAmongst these three scenarios of testing, for the DL-R, we achieve a best average location error (LE) of about 1 voxel for the lungs, kidneys, and spleen and 1.5 voxels for the liver and the thoraco- abdominal skin. The standard deviation (SD) of LE is about 1 or 2 voxels. For the delineation approach, we achieve an average Dice coefficient (DC) of about 0.92 to 0.94 for the lungs, 0.82 for the kidneys, 0.90 for the liver, 0.81 for the spleen, and 0.93 for the thoraco-abdominal skin. The SD of DC is lower for the lungs, liver, and the thoraco-abdominal skin, and slightly higher for the spleen and kidneys. ConclusionsMotivated by applications in surgical planning for disorders such as TIS, AIS, and EOS, we have shown an auto-segmentation system for thoraco-abdominal organs in dMRI acquisitions. This proposed setup copes with the challenges posed by low resolution, motion blur, inadequate contrast, and image intensity non-standardness quite well. We are in the process of testing its effectiveness on TIS patient dMRI data.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 97%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 96%
- Necessity and Impact of Specialization of Large Foundation Model for Medical Segmentation Tasks 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Segmentation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding vessels in CT images using deep convolutional neural networks and Texture Descriptors 96%
- Effective Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting COVID-19 Outcomes from Chest Computed Tomography Volumes 96%
- Probabilistic Brain MR Image Transformation Using Generative Models 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 97%
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 96%
- Enhancing Breast Ultrasound Segmentation through Fine-tuning and Optimization Techniques: Sharp Attention UNet 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Image Resolution on Automated Classification of Chest X-rays 96%
- A 3D CNN Classification Model for Accurate Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 using Computed Tomography Images 95%
- Fiberscopic Pattern Removal for Optimal Coverage in 3D Bladder Reconstructions of Fiberscope Cystoscopy Videos 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anisotropy Measure from Three Diffusion-Encoding Gradient Directions 95%
- Frequency and Phase Correction of GABA-Edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy using Complex-Valued Convolutional Neural Networks 93%
- Simulated Diagnostic Performance of Ultra-Low-Field MRI: Harnessing Open-Access Datasets to Evaluate Novel Devices 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.