Systematic large-scale application of ClinGen InSiGHT APC-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification criteria substantially alleviates the burden of variants of uncertain significance in ClinVar and LOVD databases
Yin, X.; Richardson, M. E.; Laner, A.; Shi, X.; Ognedal, E.; Vasta, V.; Hansen, T. v. O.; Pienda, M.; Ritter, D.; den Dunnen, J. T.; Hassanin, E.; Lyman Lin, W.; Borras, E.; Krahn, K.; Nordling, M.; Martins, A.; Mahmood, K.; Nadeau, E. A. W.; Beshay, V.; Tops, C.; Genuardi, M.; Pesaran, T.; Frayling, I. M.; Capella, G.; Latchford, A.; Tavtigian, S. V.; Maj, C.; Plon, S. E.; Greenblatt, M. S.; Macrae, F. A.; Spier, I.; Aretz, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundPathogenic constitutional APC variants underlie familial adenomatous polyposis, the most common hereditary gastrointestinal polyposis syndrome. To improve variant classification and resolve the interpretative challenges of variants of uncertain significance (VUS), APC-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification criteria were developed by the ClinGen-InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel (VCEP). MethodsA streamlined algorithm using the APC-specific criteria was developed and applied to assess all APC variants in ClinVar and the InSiGHT international reference APC LOVD variant database. ResultsA total of 10,228 unique APC variants were analysed. Among the ClinVar and LOVD variants with an initial classification of (Likely) Benign or (Likely) Pathogenic, 94% and 96% remained in their original categories, respectively. In contrast, 41% ClinVar and 61% LOVD VUS were reclassified into clinically actionable classes, the vast majority as (Likely) Benign. The total number of VUS was reduced by 37%. In 21 out of 36 (58%) promising APC variants that remained VUS despite evidence for pathogenicity, a data mining-driven work-up allowed their reclassification as (Likely) Pathogenic. ConclusionsThe application of APC-specific criteria substantially reduced the number of VUS in ClinVar and LOVD. The study also demonstrated the feasibility of a systematic approach to variant classification in large datasets, which might serve as a generalisable model for other gene-/disease-specific variant interpretation initiatives. It also allowed for the prioritization of VUS that will benefit from in-depth evidence collection. This subset of APC variants was approved by the VCEP and made publicly available through ClinVar and LOVD for widespread clinical use.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- AutoPVS1: An automatic classification tool for PVS1 interpretation of null variants 94%
- Using single molecule Molecular Inversion Probes as a cost-effective, high-throughput sequencing approach to target all genes and loci associated with macular diseases 93%
- Whole genome sequencing of ‘mutation-negative’ individuals with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing performance of pathogenicity predictors using clinically-relevant variant datasets 93%
- A comparative medical genomics approach may facilitate the interpretation of rare missense variation 93%
- Exome sequencing as a first-tier test for copy number variant detection : retrospective evaluation and prospective screening in 2418 cases 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Bayesian Classification Framework on the Variant Classification of Hereditary Cancer Predisposition Genes 96%
- Assessment of the variant prioritisation strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study 94%
- Impact of genetic counselling strategy on diagnostic yield and workload for whole genome sequencing-based tumour diagnostics 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Germline and Tumor Whole Genome Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool to Resolve Suspected Lynch Syndrome 92%
- Concordance of whole-genome long-read sequencing with standard clinical testing for Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes 91%
- A Validated Functional Analysis of PALB2 Missense Variants for Use in Clinical Variant Interpretation 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.