Protocol for assessing the impact of the 6th National Audit Project recommendations on practice
Clark, S. E.; Moppett, I.; Moonesinghe, S. R.; Vindrola-Padros, C.
Show abstract
1.Patient safety has been a growing area of concern, especially within perioperative care where risks of major complications during surgery exist. Anaphylaxis in the operating theatre is a life-threatening drug reaction that happens suddenly, without warning and can affect anyone. The 6th National Audit Project (NAP6) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists (RCoA): Perioperative Anaphylaxis was the largest ever prospective study of anaphylaxis related to anaesthesia and surgery. The findings from the audit were collated into a report and included recommendations for improved patient care. The purpose of this study is to understand the perceptions of the NAP6 recommendations and their impact on practice. This study will use ethnographic qualitative methods in the form of observations, interviews and a documentary analysis. The sessions targeted for observations will include departmental or hospital meetings, and educational or training sessions, related to perioperative anaphylaxis. The target sample size of 78 healthcare professionals across six hospitals within England, will include individuals with roles specific to anaesthesia, surgery, immunology, allergy and governance. Additionally, six stakeholders will be interviewed who can provide insights into the NAP6 recommendations at the national level. Across the six sites, local collaborators will share any relevant documents related to perioperative anaphylaxis or the NAP-6 recommendations. The study has received regulatory approvals from the Health Research Authority and has been funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 93%
- Frontline healthcare workers’ experiences with personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid qualitative appraisal 93%
- Personal protective equipment for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers involved in emergency trauma surgery during the pandemic: a systematic review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prohibiting Babel - A call for professional remote interpreting services in pre-operation anaesthesia information 93%
- Virtual reality as a strategy for intra-operatory anxiolysis and pharmacological sparing in patients undergoing breast surgeries: the V-RAPS randomized controlled trial protocol 93%
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 92%
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 91%
- Development and evaluation of rapid data-enabled access to routine clinical information to enhance early recruitment to the national clinical platform trial of COVID-19 community treatments 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- DALES - a prospective cross-sectional study of incidence of penicillin allergy labels, risk of true allergy and attitudes of patients and anaesthetists to de-labelling strategies 94%
- Effect of Telemedicine Support for Intraoperative Anaesthesia Care on Postoperative Outcomes: The TECTONICS Randomised Clinical Trial 92%
- The impact of female sex on anaesthetic awareness, depth and emergence: A systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 93%
- Anaesthesia delivery systems in low and lower-middle-income Asian countries: a scoping review of capacity and effectiveness 93%
- Snotwatch COVID-Toes: An ecological study of chilblains and COVID-19 diagnoses in Victoria, Australia 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.