Examining Effective Patient-Provider Communication in Antenatal Settings across England: An In-Depth Analysis of Womans Experiences
Andrzejczak, M.; Jones, G.; Nye, G.
Show abstract
Pregnancy requires appropriate guidance and support from healthcare professionals. Understanding womens experiences of effective patient-provider communication through antenatal care is critical, as evidence suggests, inadequate communication could pose various risks to maternal and neonatal well-being. Despite efforts to modernise maternity services, recent assessments reveal persistent challenges, with nearly half of maternity services inspections categorised as inadequate or requires improvement. This qualitative systematic review investigated effective patient-provider communication in antenatal care settings across England, contributing essential insights into womens experiences and feelings from various backgrounds. MethodsThis study utilised the PICo framework to formulate the research question, focusing on effective patient-provider communication in antenatal care settings across England. A comprehensive search involving various study types was conducted across electronic databases from 2010 onwards. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were predefined, and relevant studies underwent thorough screening. Data synthesis involved a qualitative descriptive approach, employing thematic analysis to capture diverse experiences. Findings were summarised through coded extracts, supporting quotes, and a narrative addressing womens experiences. ResultsThe search identified 46 records, with six studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Results were synthesised utilising thematic analysis approach. Subsequently, five themes were distinguished: Responsive and engaging communication; Individualised treatment; Clear presentation of service information and informed choice; Continuity of care; and Additional ways of communication. The study identified key suggestions to improve patient-provider communication in antenatal care, including tailored training programmes aimed at HCPs focusing on empathy, active listening, building emotional connections, establishing trust, and providing continuity of care. Recommendations also emphasise transparent information and empowering women through communication. Likewise, suggestions extend to the incorporation of cultural safety training initiatives and addressing structural issues within the system. The study, however featured experiences of minority ethnic women, which may potentially impact results, limiting the findings generalisability. In addition, measuring womens views amid the emotional intensity associated with pregnancy presents inherent challenges, hypothetically affecting the depth of understanding of the experiences. ConclusionFew key conclusions derived from women experiences highlight the need to re-address barriers to communication. Proposed strategies offer practical steps, but further research is urged to address emerging challenges by advocating for improved communication strategies in order to enhance prenatal care nationally.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice 97%
- Exploring midwives understanding of respectful and non-abusive maternal care in Kumasi, Ghana: Qualitative Inquiry 97%
- “We felt like part of a production system”: a qualitative study on women’s experience of mistreatment during childbirth in Switzerland 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 97%
- Factors affecting the mental health of pregnant women using UK maternity services during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative interview study 97%
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 97%
- Companionship for women using English maternity services during COVID-19: National and organisational perspectives 97%
- Mapping factors that may influence attrition and retention of midwives: a scoping review protocol 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study investigating the acceptability of cervical screening and self-sampling in postnatal women at 6-week postnatal check-up 95%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 95%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Family-centered postnatal training and adherence to newborn care practices in district hospitals in two Indian states: A quasi-experimental intervention study 95%
- A mixed methods study of attitudes on location of gynaecological oncology outpatient care: a patient and healthcare professional questionnaire 94%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.