Temporal trends in online practices relating to autism and/or ADHD: a scoping review protocol
Leiser, R. F.; Flowers, P.; Miyake, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundIncreasing rates of neurodivergence diagnosis have received much attention in recent months. This is particularly true of autism and/or ADHD self-diagnoses precipitated by social media use. Mainstream media - at a minimum in English-speaking Western countries - has been quick to report on this, and it is clear that a social media-facilitated phenomenon is underway. To date, however, empirical evidence related to increased visibility of, and engagement with, autism and/or ADHD content online over time is lacking. ObjectiveTo map temporal trends in online practices relating to neurodivergence - specifically confined here to autism and/or ADHD - within the published literature. Areas of interest include: how framing of the concept(s) change over time; the theories represented within research on this topic; whether the focal point of these online practices has changed over time. Inclusion criteriaPublished literature from any country and any time period after 1991, that relate to online activity involving what currently is often referred to as neurodivergence - here specifically confined to autism and/or ADHD. Online practices encompasses any aspect of online communication, information-seeking, support-seeking, awareness-raising, or associated practices that take place online - via search engines, chat rooms, forums, social media platforms. Studies looking at other conditions under the neurodivergence umbrella, and those pertaining to cyberbullying and internet addiction only will be excluded. MethodsFollowing the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews, 4 databases (Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and APA PsycInfo) will be searched. Inclusion criteria will be used to screen for, and select, appropriate studies. The JBI extraction tool will be adapted for this particular review, and the relevant data from included studies exported to this document. Both narrative accounts and figures of the data trends will be synthesised and presented.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The lived experience of rejection sensitivity in ADHD - a qualitative exploration 94%
- Study protocol for the EYEdentify project: An examination of gaze behaviour in autistic adults using a virtual reality-based paradigm 93%
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 94%
- School Distress in UK School Children: Characteristics and Consequences 93%
- Use of the Internet and digital devices among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation on the Effectiveness on the Implementation of WHO-CST Programme in Hong Kong: A RCT Protocol 93%
- Scalable Transdiagnostic Early Assessment of Mental health (STREAM): Study Protocol 91%
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Global burden of mental health problems among children and adolescents during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic umbrella review 92%
- The relationship between screen-based behaviors and adolescent mental health: a phenotypic and genetic analysis 92%
- The prevalence, incidence and risk factors of mental health problems and mental health services use before and 9 months after the COVID-19 outbreak among the general Dutch population. A 3-wave prospective study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.