Back

Trends in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) research: a systematic scoping review and bibliometric analysis

McQuire, C.; Frennessen, N. F.; Parsonage, J.; van der Heiden, M.; Troy, D.; Zuccolo, L.

2024-04-30 public and global health
10.1101/2024.04.29.24306557 medRxiv
Show abstract

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is a leading cause of neurodevelopmental disability globally. International health and policy organisations have highlighted an urgent need for improved prevention, diagnosis, and support. However, the evidence base needed to inform this is thought to be limited. We conducted a systematic scoping review and bibliometric analysis to describe trends in the volume and characteristics of original research on FASD published between 2000-2023 (Review 1). We compared the volume of published research on FASD to that of other neurodevelopmental disorders (Review 2). Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo (Review 1) and PubMed (Review 2). Eligible studies were original research articles with FASD terms in the title (Review 1) and all records with FASD, autism, or attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder terms in the title (Review 2) published between 2000-2023. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics, narrative syntheses, and time-series plots to depict trends in common themes, countries of publication, sample characteristics, and research volume. This review found that FASD remains significantly under-researched. While there has been an increase in the number of original FASD research articles published annually over the last 23-years, this is significantly lower than what would be expected based on comparison with publication trends for other neurodevelopmental conditions, and the wider scientific literature. Further research is needed to understand the needs and impact of FASD across the lifespan and within different populations, to inform evidence-based prevention, policy, and support, and to advance progress in strength-based, stigma-reducing approaches to FASD research and practice. Statements and DeclarationsThe authors declare no conflicts of interest

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.3%
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.9%
4
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
8
Addiction
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
12
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Archives of Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
European Journal of Public Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Systematic Reviews
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
European Psychiatry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
26
JCPP Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%