Back

Temporal dynamics and biogeography of sympagic and planktonic autotrophic microbial eukaryotes during the under-ice Arctic bloom

Sim, C. W. H.; Ribeiro, C. G.; Le Gall, F.; Probert, I.; Gourvil, P.; Lovejoy, C.; Vaulot, D.; Lopes dos Santos, A.

2024-04-29 ecology
10.1101/2024.04.26.591324 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Photosynthetic microbial eukaryotes play a pivotal role as primary producers in the Arctic Ocean, where seasonal blooms within and below the ice are crucial phenomena, contributing significantly to global primary production and biogeochemical cycling. In this study, we investigated the taxonomic composition of sympagic algae and phytoplankton communities during the Arctic under-ice spring bloom using metabarcoding of the 18S rRNA gene. Samples were obtained from three size fractions over a period of nearly three months at an ice camp deployed on landfast ice off the coast of Baffin Island as part of the Green Edge project. We classified the major sympagic and phytoplankton taxa found in this study into biogeographical categories using publicly available metabarcoding data from more than 2 800 oceanic and coastal marine samples. This study demonstrated the temporal succession of taxonomic groups during the development of the under-ice bloom, illustrated by an overall transition from polar to polar-temperate taxa, in particular in the smallest size fraction. Overlooked classes such as Pelagophyceae (undescribed Pelagomonadales clade A1 and the genus Ankylochrysis), Bolidophyceae (Parmales environmental clade 2), and Cryptophyceae (Baffinella frigidus) might play a greater role than anticipated within the pico-sized communities in and under the ice pack during the pre-bloom period. Finally, we emphasize the importance of microdiversity, taking the example of B. frigidus for which a new strain isolated during Green Edge represents an ice ecotype while the type strain is clearly linked to marine waters.

Published in ISME Communications (predicted rank #8) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.