Back

Leveraging AI for improved reproducibility of mathematical disease models: insights from a retinitis pigmentosa case study

Thibault-Greugny, E.; Ratto, N.; Etheve, L.; Gourlet, J.-B.; Cogny, F.; Monteiro, C.

2024-04-30 systems biology
10.1101/2024.04.26.591317 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mathematical modeling of disease and drug action is becoming an indispensable component of drug development, underscored by recent examples of models predicting trial results. To be able to rely on such approaches, decision-makers need to be able to verify those results independently with in silico confirmatory studies. Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers a valuable avenue for improving the reproducibility of complex models, enabling their swift and software-agnostic deployment. This paper highlights AIs impact through a case study on an Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) model of Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP). We use a version of Chat GPT 4, a sophisticated large language model (LLM) developed by OpenAI, as customized by Mathpix company with additional capabilities. This setup facilitated the extraction of equations from the PDF and converted into a human-readable, text-based definition language called Antimony, which is part of the Python package tellurium. Subsequently, the model was converted into Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) using tellurium and uploaded onto the jink[o] platform for simulation. The RP model was efficiently and accurately implemented using AI techniques. Furthermore, we were able to reproduce the model behavior presented in the literature. Our findings advocate for the broader application of AI in mathematical model re-implementations to ensure reliability and reproducibility of the results.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.6%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.5%
4
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.0%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.5%
7
Frontiers in Systems Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
8
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.8%
9
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.2%
12
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
13
BMC Research Notes
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
14
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Gigabyte
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
18
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
21
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%
24
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
25
mLife
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%
26
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
28
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.5%
29
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%