Back

AI-based model for T1-weighted brain MRI diagnoses Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Turrisi, R.; Forzanini, F.; Stanziano, M.; Nigri, A.; Fedeli, D.; Giovanna, C.; Laura, L.; Manera, U.; Moglia, C.; Valentini, M. C.; Calvo, A.; Chio', A.; Barla, A.

2024-04-28 health informatics
10.1101/2024.04.26.24306438 medRxiv
Show abstract

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is an incurable deadly motor neuron disease that causes the gradual deterioration of nerve cells in the spinal cord and brain. It impacts voluntary limb control and can result in breathing impairment. ALS diagnosis is often challenging due to its symptoms overlapping with other medical conditions and many tests must be performed to rule out other conditions, as easily identifiable biomarkers are still lacking. In this study, we explore T1-weighted (T1w) brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), a non-invasive neuroimaging approach which has shown to be a reliable biomarker in many medical fields. Nonetheless, current literature on ALS diagnosis fails to retrieve evidence on how to identify biomarkers from T1w MRI. In this paper, we leverage Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods to unveil the unexplored potential of T1w brain MRI for distinguishing ALS patients from those who have similar symptoms but different diseases (mimicking). We consider a retrospective single-center dataset of brain T1-weighted MRIs collected from 2010 to 2018 recruited from the Piemonte and Valle dAosta ALS register (PARALS). The collection includes 548 patients with ALS and 106 with mimicking diseases. Our goal is to develop and validate a ML diagnostic model based exclusively on T1w MRI distinguishing the two classes. First, we extract a set of radiomic features and two sets of Deep Learning (DL)-based features from MRI scans. Then, using each representation, we train 8 binary classifiers. The best results were obtained by combining DL-based features with SVM classifier, reaching an F1-score of 0.91, and a Precision of 0.88, a Recall of 0.94, and an AUC of 0.7 considering the ALS group as the positive class in the testing set.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.7%
3
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
4
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
6
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
8
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
9
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
10
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
11
NMR in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
15
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
19
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%