Back

Productivity and resilience of Chinook salmon compromised by Mixed-Maturation fisheries in marine waters

Gayeski, N.; MacDuffee, M.; Rosenberger, A.; Swanson, D.

2024-04-28 ecology
10.1101/2024.04.25.591098 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Most Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the northeast Pacific Ocean are harvested in mixed-stock marine fisheries. Here, multiple populations with varying abundance and productivities are encountered. In addition, many of these fisheries generally encounter both mature and immature Chinook. Hence, these fisheries are better described as mixed-stock and "mixed-maturation" (MM) fisheries. Harvest of immature fish can skew the age composition of Chinook populations towards younger, and hence smaller, individuals. Older Chinook are generally larger and contribute disproportionately to the productivity of their populations. We developed an individual-based demographic-genetic model of ocean-type Chinook to evaluate the effects of fisheries that harvest immature Chinook. We then compared those effects to terminal fisheries that harvest only mature fish. Our model provides the ability to assess the benefits of terminal Chinook fisheries to both landed catch and Chinook rebuilding. Recovered populations show a more archetypal age- and sex-structure than contemporary ocean-type Chinook subject to marine mixed-maturation fisheries. In our modeled scenarios of mixed-maturation fisheries, we found that immature Chinook can comprise up to 59% of the total numbers of fish caught, and 47% of the total weight of the catch. If instead, these Chinook were not harvested until they mature and reach terminal fisheries, they would contribute greater biomass to landed catches. These terminal fisheries allow a higher percentage of larger, older Chinook to escape, and would increase the fecundity and productivities of their populations. The benefits of terminal fisheries would accrue to fishers, sustainable wild harvesting, wildlife, and the rebuilding of depleted Chinook runs.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.6%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.5%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
6
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
8
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.8%
10
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.2%
12
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
16
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.6%