A cross ancestry genetic study of psychiatric disorders from India
Holla, B.; Mahadevan, J.; Ganesha, S.; Sud, R.; Janardhanan, M.; Balachander, S.; Strom, N.; Mattheisen, M.; Sullivan, P. F.; Huang, H.; Zandi, P.; Benegal, V.; Reddy, J. Y.; Jain, S.; CVEDA collaborators, ; ADBS-CBM consortium, ; iPSYCH OCD consortium, ; NORDiC OCD & Related Disorders Consortium, ; Purushottam, M.; Viswanath, B.
Show abstract
Genome-wide association studies across diverse populations may help validate and confirm genetic contributions to risk of disease. We estimated the extent of population stratification as well as the predictive accuracy of polygenic scores (PGS) derived from European samples to a data set from India. We analysed 2685 samples from two data sets, a population neurodevelopmental study (cVEDA) and a hospital-based sample of bipolar affective disorder (BD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Genotyping was conducted using Illuminas Global Screening Array. Population structure was examined with principal component analysis (PCA), uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP), support vector machine (SVM) ancestry predictions, and admixture analysis. PGS were calculated from the largest available European discovery GWAS summary statistics for BD, OCD, and externalizing traits using two Bayesian methods that incorporate local linkage disequilibrium structures (PGS-CS-auto) and functional genomic annotations (SBayesRC). Our analyses reveal global and continental PCA overlap with other South Asian populations. Admixture analysis revealed a north-south genetic axis within India (FST 1.6%). The UMAP partially reconstructed the contours of the Indian subcontinent. The Bayesian PGS analyses indicates moderate-to-high predictive power for BD. This was despite the cross-ancestry bias of the discovery GWAS dataset, with the currently available data. However, accuracy for OCD and externalizing traits was much lower. The predictive accuracy was perhaps influenced by the sample size of the discovery GWAS and phenotypic heterogeneity across the syndromes and traits studied. Our study results highlight the accuracy and generalizability of newer PGS models across ancestries. Further research, across diverse populations, would help understand causal mechanisms that contribute to psychiatric syndromes and traits.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Stability of Polygenic Scores Across Discovery Genome-Wide Association Studies 93%
- Whole genome sequence-based association analysis of African American individuals with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia 92%
- Evaluation of imputation performance of multiple reference panels in a Pakistani population 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of ten polygenic score methods for psychiatric disorders applied across multiple cohorts 95%
- Investigating direct and indirect genetic effects in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using parent-offspring trios 94%
- Examining sex-differentiated genetic effects across neuropsychiatric and behavioral traits 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association analysis reveals extensive genetic overlap between mood instability and psychiatric disorders but divergent patterns of genetic effects 94%
- "The Heidelberg Five" Personality Dimensions: Genome-wide Associations, Polygenic Risk for Neuroticism, and Psychopathology 20 Years after Assessment 94%
- Multi-polygenic scores in psychiatry: from disorder-specific to transdiagnostic perspectives 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.