Automating Responses to Patient Portal Messages Using Generative AI
Kaur, A.; Budko, A.; Liu, K.; Eaton, E.; Steitz, B.; Johnson, K. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundPatient portals serve as vital bridges between patients and providers, playing an increasing role in healthcare communication. The rising volume and complexity of these messages is exacerbating physician and nursing burnout. Recent studies have demonstrated that AI chatbots can generate message responses that are viewed favorably by healthcare professionals; however, these studies have not included the diverse range of messages typically found in patient portals. Our goal is to investigate the quality of GPT-generated message responses across the spectrum of message types within a patient portal. MethodsWe used novel prompt engineering techniques to craft synthetic responses tailored to adult primary care patients. We enrolled a sample of primary care providers in a cross-sectional study to compare authentic with synthetic patient portal message responses, generated by GPT-4. The survey assessed each messages empathy, relevance, medical accuracy, and readability on a scale from 0 to 5. Respondents were asked to identify messages that were GPT-generated vs. provider-generated. Mean scores for all metrics were computed for subsequent analysis. ResultsA total of 49 health care providers participated in the survey (59% completion rate), comprising 16 physicians and 32 advanced practice providers (APPs). When presented with GPT vs. authentic message response pairs, participants correctly identified GPT-generated responses 73% of the time and correctly identified authentic responses 50% of the time. In comparison to messages generated by physicians, GPT-4 generated messages exhibited higher mean scores for empathy (3.57 vs. 3.07, p < 0.001), relevance (3.94 vs. 3.81, p = 0.08) accuracy (4.05 vs. 3.95, p= 0.12) and readability (4.5 vs. 4.13, p < 0.001). LimitationsThe study is a single site, single-specialty study, limited due to the use of synthetic data. ConclusionOur findings affirm the potential of GPT-generated patient portal message responses to achieve comparable levels of empathy, relevance, and readability to those found in typical responses according to the health care providers and indicates promising prospects for their integration in the healthcare sector. Additional studies should be done within provider workflows and with careful evaluation of patient attitudes and concerns related to the ethics as well as the quality of generated patient portal message responses in all settings.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Anti-LGBTQIA+ Medical Bias in Large Language Models 96%
- Harnessing the Open Access Version of ChatGPT for Enhanced Clinical Opinions 95%
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Utilization of Generative AI-drafted Responses for Managing Patient-Provider Communication 96%
- A typology of physician input approaches to using AI chatbots for clinical decision-making: a mixed methods study 95%
- A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 94%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 94%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 94%
- Design and implementation of a system for automated monitoring of adherence to evidenced-based clinical guideline recommendations 94%
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.