No-code machine learning in radiology: implementation and validation of a platform that allows clinicians to train their own models
Elton, D. C.; Dasegowda, G.; Sato, J. Y.; Frias, E. G.; Mamonov, A. B.; Walters, M.; Ziemelis, M.; Schultz, T. J.; Bizzo, B. C.; Dreyer, K. J.; Kalra, M. K.
Show abstract
Machine learning models can assist clinicians and researchers in many tasks within radiology such as diagnosis, triage, segmentation/measurement, and quality assurance. To better leverage machine learning we have developed a platform that allows users to label data and train models without requiring any programming knowledge. The technology stack consists of a TypeScript web application running on .NET for user interaction, Python, PyTorch, and MONAI for machine learning, DICOM WADO-RS to retrieve data from clinical systems, and Docker for model management. As a first trial of the system, researchers used it to train a model for clavicle fracture detection as part of an IRB-approved retrospective study. The researchers labeled 4,135 clavicle radiographs from 2,039 patients across 13 sites. The platform automatically split the data into training, validation, and test sets and trained a model until the validation loss plateaued. The system then returned a receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC, F1, and other metrics. The resulting model identifies clavicle fractures with 90% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and 88% accuracy with an AUC of 0.95. This model performance is equivalent to or better than similar models reported in the literature. More recently, our system was used to train a model to identify if ultrasound frames that contain personally identifiable information (PII). After validation, the model was used to help de-identify a large dataset that was to be used for research. This first-of-its-kind system streamlines model development and deployment and opens up an exciting new pathway for the use of AI within healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 96%
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 95%
- Investigating the relationship between internal spinal alignment and back shape in patients with scoliosis using PCdare: a comparative, reliability and validation study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation and prospective real-time evaluation of a generalized system for in-clinic deployment and validation of machine learning models in radiology 96%
- Classification of Hyper-scale Multimodal Imaging Datasets 95%
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 95%
- Comparing performance of deep convolutional neural network with orthopaedic surgeons on identification of total hip prosthesis design from plain radiographs 93%
- SCU-Net: A deep learning method for segmentation and quantification of breast arterial calcifications on mammograms 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 96%
- Fully automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial CT scans for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery planning using the nnU-Net framework 94%
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- MyoVision-US: an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software for Automated Analysis of Skeletal Muscle Ultrasonography 94%
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 94%
- Tracking And Predicting COVID-19 Radiological Trajectory Using Deep Learning On Chest X-Rays: Initial Accuracy Testing 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.