Flexible and scalable participatory syndromic and virological surveillance for respiratory infections: our experiences in The Netherlands
Smit, T.; Carstens, G.; Han, W.; Bulsink, K.; de Bakker, J.; Elahi, M.; van Gageldonk-Lafeber, R.; van den Hof, S.; Eggink, D.; van Hoek, A. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic participatory digital syndromic surveillance systems proved itself, as it is scalable, flexible and function independent from the health care system or health care seeking behaviour. A limitation of syndromic surveillance is the inability of pathogen identification. We describe our experiences regarding integrating self-swabs with centralized testing into a participatory syndromic surveillance system in the Netherlands (Infectieradar). MethodsIn the 2022/2023 winter season Infectieradar was extended to include nose- and throat swabs. Participants received test-kits including SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests for home use as well as nose- and throat swabs. All SARS-CoV-2 positive participants and a random sample of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 self-test negative participants were asked to return a nose- and throat swab by regular post. Self-test negative swabs were tested by multiplex-PCR on 22 pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2. Self-test SARS-CoV-2 positive samples with a Ct-value < 30 were sequenced for variant analysis. ResultsOver 17,000 participants were included in the study. We collected 1,475 (median: 37 per week) swabs from participants with positive and 4,096 swabs (median: 136 per week) from participants with negative SARS-CoV-2 antigen self-tests. Of the swabs following a negative self-test, 47.7% tested positive in the multiplex-PCR, and rhinovirus/enterovirus was the most frequently detected pathogen (24.5%). Self-test SARS-CoV-2 positivity was laboratory-confirmed in 96.1% of swabs and showed parallel variant distributions as the national SARS-CoV-2 variant surveillance. ConclusionThis large-scale, centralized participatory surveillance system provides a comprehensive approach for performing syndromic and virological surveillance in the general population, including respiratory pathogen detection by self-test or multiplex-PCR. Given the continuous collection of samples among those who dont seek care, the system provides valuable insights into circulating respiratory pathogens and is part of an answer on how to study the transmission, competition, virulence and evolution of circulating pathogens in interpandemic periods.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance Evaluation Of A SARS-COV-2 Rapid Antigentest: Test Performance In The Community In The Netherlands 95%
- The COVID HOME study research protocol: Prospective cohort study of non-hospitalised COVID-19 patients 95%
- Patterns of testing in the extensive Danish national SARS-CoV-2 test set-up 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bigger and Better? Representativeness of the Influenza A surveillance using one consolidated clinical microbiology laboratory data set as compared to the Belgian Sentinel Network of Laboratories 93%
- Estimating the COVID-19 Prevalence in Spain with Indirect Reporting via Open Surveys 92%
- Social contacts and transmission of COVID-19 in British Columbia, Canada 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: a Prospective Household cohort study of Influenza, Respiratory Syncytial virus, and other respiratory pathogens community burden and Transmission dynamics in South Africa (PHIRST), 2016-2018 93%
- The REinfection in COVID-19 Estimation of Risk (RECOVER) study: Reinfection and serology dynamics in a cohort of Canadian healthcare workers 93%
- Retrospective screening for SARS-CoV-2 among 5,800 hospitalizations related to influenza-like illness during the 2018-19 pre-pandemic and 2019-2020 pandemic influenza seasons in the VAHNSI network, Spain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (Abbott) compared to RT-qPCR 94%
- Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection: A test-negative case-control study with additional population controls 94%
- Risk factors, symptom reporting, healthcare-seeking behaviour and adherence to public health guidance: protocol for Virus Watch, a prospective community cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-collected oral, nasal and saliva samples yield sensitivity comparable to professional-collected oro-nasopharyngeal swabs in SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis 94%
- Day by day symptoms following positive and negative PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 in non-hospitalised health-care workers: a 90-day follow-up study 92%
- Performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test compared with real-time RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.