Back

Stones in Our Pockets: Mental Health Dimensions of Grief in Contemporary Video Games

Reay, E.; Ma, M.; Mankee-Williams, A.; Pavarini, G.; Shaughnessy, N.; Bhui, K.

2024-04-23 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.04.23.24306235 medRxiv
Show abstract

This article combines the expertise of games studies scholars, medical ethicists, and clinical psychologists to analyse representations of grief in contemporary video games. Grief is a universal human experience, but navigating its psychological, social, and embodied effects can be a challenging task. Constructionist approaches to grief therapy emphasise the importance of metaphors for understanding the experience of loss (Nadeau 2006; Young 2008; Neimeyer 2010; Southall 2013). Paying attention to the metaphorical language used by a client can provide a therapist with key information about the clients personal and cultural perspectives and world view. Equally, a therapist can work with clients to devise metaphors that shift their perspectives and aid the process of meaning-making. Video games provide players with new metaphors to express and explore grief. Since video games communicate across audio, visual, verbal, haptic, mechanical, and performative modes, they can offer a complete gestalt that touches on the physical, emotional, practical, and systemic impact of loss. In this article, we survey the multimodal metaphors for grief that appear in 14 commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) video games and identify recurring tropes and themes. We consider 1) what is illuminated by these metaphors? 2) what is obscured by these metaphors? and 3) what are the therapeutic implications of these metaphors? We conclude with a set of recommendations for game developers who want to design serious games that explore emotionally fraught topics, and a set of recommendations for grief and bereavement therapists seeking to integrate video games into their practice.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.