Back

Effective Coverage of Management of Wasting in Ethiopia

Farah, A. M.; Gebreselassie, S. G.; Rago, B.; Kebede, A.; Barsenga, K.; Chiriga, M.; Darge, T.; Ndumiyana, T.; Yimer, T.; Darsene, H.; Kelbessa, S.; Yilma, B.; Gebreyesus, S. H.

2024-04-24 nutrition
10.1101/2024.04.23.24306206 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChild wasting, or acute malnutrition, is a life-threatening condition that increases the risk of death and serious illness. Despite efforts such as the Global Action Plan on Child Wasting, which aims to reduce wasting prevalence to less than 3% by 2030, challenges persist, with Ethiopia recording a 7.2% rate. A major shortcoming of the global strategy is the focus on contact coverage, which often overlooks service quality. Effective coverage that incorporates the quality of health services offers a solution. ObjectiveTo assess the effective coverage of management of child wasting in six regions of Ethiopia. Data and MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data obtained from household and institutional surveys. Participants included caregivers and children aged 6-59 months. By combining household data with expanded measures of health facility readiness and process quality from health posts, we calculated the quality-adjusted coverage. ResultsContact coverage for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) and moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) was 40% and 37%, respectively. Readiness scores for providing SAM and MAM services at health posts were 57.9% and 76.4%, respectively. The input-adjusted coverage for SAM and MAM, considering facility readiness, was 23% and 28%, respectively. The coverage adjusted for complete intervention receipt was 7% for SAM and 12% for MAM. Quality-adjusted coverage for both SAM and MAM was 4%. ConclusionEfforts to address acute malnutrition in the Ethiopian health system show commendable progress but also highlight critical gaps and inconsistencies. A holistic, quality-driven approach is needed to effectively combat child-wasting in Ethiopia. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIHousehold surveys and facility data were concurrently collected within the same year. This allowed for an effective comparison between the readiness of facilities and services provided for acute malnutrition at that time. C_LIO_LIThe selection of items for readiness and process quality was guided by WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment and the National Guideline for the Management of Acute Malnutrition. C_LIO_LIThe study included only health posts in selected IMAM districts. This restricts the generalizability of the findings, as the care characteristics and quality at these excluded facilities might differ significantly. C_LIO_LIAlthough the health facility survey was extensive, it did not capture all the necessary data for a holistic calculation of the care cascade, particularly missing information needed for user adherence-adjusted coverage and outcome-adjusted coverage. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.2%
4
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
7
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
9
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
11
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
14
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
16
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
18
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%
21
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%