A Qualitative Interview Study of General Practitioners' Experiences of Managing Post-COVID-19 Syndrome
Schulze, J.; Lind, L.; Rojas, A.; Luedtke, L.; Hensen, J.; Bergelt, C.; Haerter, M.; Pohontsch, N. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe management of the long-term sequelae of COVID-19 infection, known as post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS), continues to challenge the medical community, largely due to a significant gap in the understanding of its aetiology, diagnosis and effective treatment. AimTo examine general practitioners (GPs) experiences of caring for patients with PCS and to identify unmet care needs and opportunities for improvement. Design and settingThis study follows a qualitative design, using in-depth semi-structured telephone interviews with GPs (N=31) from across Germany. MethodInterviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis. ResultsPatients with persistent symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection often consult their GPs as the first point of contact, with symptoms typically resolving within weeks. While ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 is perceived to be more common, the relevance of PCS to GP practices is considerable given its severe impact on patients functioning, social participation, and the substantial time required for patient care. GPs coordinate diagnosis and treatment, but face difficulties because of the unclear definition of PCS and difficulties in attributing symptoms, resulting in a cautious approach to ICD-10 coding. Interviewees highlight lengthy diagnostic pathways and barriers to accessing specialist care. ConclusionThe findings confirm the high functional limitations and psychosocial burden of PCS on patients and the central role of GPs in their care. The study suggests a need for further research and health policy measures to support GPs in navigating diagnostic uncertainty, interprofessional communication and the limited evidence on effective treatments. How this fits inPost-COVID-19 syndrome has garnered attention in research and healthcare, but limited evidence on its causes and effective treatment challenges clinicians. This study illustrates the symptom-driven approaches to diagnosis and treatment adopted by general practitioners and their concerns about referring patients to specialist clinics. Greater collaboration and communication across sectors and disciplines is needed to meet the identified need for interprofessional care. Research should also focus on developing comprehensive differential diagnostic protocols, and health policy should address barriers to accessing specific outpatient services.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 94%
- The patient experience of COVID-19: A qualitative investigation with symptomatic outpatients 94%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Limited recovery from post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) at eight months in a prospective cohort 91%
- COVID-PCD – a participatory research study on the impact of COVID-19 in people with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia 91%
- Virtual rehabilitation for individuals with Long COVID: a randomized controlled trial. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reclaiming health: a qualitative, explorative study of long covid recovery journeys involving mind-body approaches. 92%
- A Pattern-Based Heart Rate Variability Approach in Somatic Symptom Disorder: Evidence from the SOMA.SSD Study 88%
- Early Evidence and Predictors of Mental Distress of Adults One Month in the COVID-19 Epidemic in Brazil 87%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 93%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants’ Access to Primary Care: A National Qualitative Study 93%
- Primary care transformation in Scotland: a comparison two cross-sectional national surveys of general practitioners’ views in 2018 and 2023 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.