Back

C-reactive protein-based tuberculosis triage testing: a multi-country diagnostic accuracy study

Derendinger, B.; Mochizuki, T. K.; Marcelo, D.; Shankar, D.; Mangeni, W.; Nguyen, H.; Yerikaya, S.; Worodria, W.; Yu, C.; Nguyen, N. V.; Christopher, D. J.; Theron, G.; Phillips, P. P.; Nahid, P.; Denkinger, C. M.; Cattamanchi, A.; Yoon, C.

2024-04-24 infectious diseases Community evaluation
10.1101/2024.04.23.24305228 medRxiv
Show abstract

RationaleC-reactive protein (CRP)-based tuberculosis (TB) screening is recommended for people with HIV (PWH). However, its performance among people without HIV and in diverse settings is unknown. ObjectivesIn a multi-country study, we aimed to determine whether CRP meets the minimum accuracy targets (sensitivity [≥]90%, specificity [≥]70%) for an effective TB triage test. Methods/MeasurementsConsecutive outpatient adults with cough [≥]2 weeks from five TB endemic countries in Africa and Asia had baseline blood collected for point-of-care CRP testing and HIV and diabetes screening. Sputum samples were collected for Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert) testing and culture. CRP sensitivity and specificity (5 mg/L cut-point) was determined in reference to sputum test results and compared by country, sex, and HIV and diabetes status. Variables affecting CRP performance were identified using a multivariate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) regression model. ResultsAmong 2904 participants, of whom 613 (21%) had microbiologically-confirmed TB, CRP sensitivity was 84% (95% CI: 81-87%) and specificity was 61% (95% CI: 59-63%). CRP accuracy varied geographically, with higher sensitivity in African countries ([≥]91%) than Asian countries (64-82%). Sensitivity was higher among men than women (87% vs. 79%, difference +8%, 95% CI: 1-15%) and specificity was higher among people without HIV than PWH (64% vs. 45%, difference +19%, 95% CI: 13-25%). ROC regression identified country and measures of TB disease severity as predictors of CRP performance. ConclusionsOverall, CRP did not achieve the minimum accuracy targets and its performance varied by setting and in some sub-groups, likely reflecting population differences in mycobacterial load.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.