Scanner-based real-time 3D brain+body slice-to-volume reconstruction for T2-weighted 0.55T low field fetal MRI
Uus, A. U.; Neves Silva, S.; Aviles Verdera, J.; Payette, K.; Hall, M.; Colford, K.; Luis, A.; Sousa, H. S.; Ning, Z.; Roberts, T.; Roberts, T.; McElroy, S.; Deprez, M.; Hajnal, J.; Rutherford, M. A.; Story, L.; Hutter, J.
Show abstract
PurposeIntegrating the SVRTK methods within the Gadgetron framework enables automated 3D fetal brain and body reconstruction in the low-field 0.55T MRI scanner within the duration of the scan. MethodsA deep-learning based, integrated, robust, and deployable workflow from several motion-corrupted individual T2-weighted single-shot Turbo Spin Echo stacks to produce super-resolved 3D reconstructed fetal brain and body is enabled by combining automated deformable and rigid Slice-to-Volume (D/SVR) reconstruction adapted for low field MRI with a real-time scanner-based Gadgetron workflow. Qualitative evaluation of the pipeline in terms of image quality and efficiency is performed in 12 prospectively acquired fetal datasets from the 22-40 weeks gestational age range. ResultsThe reconstructions were available on average 6:42{+/-}3:13 minutes after the acquisition of the final stack and could be assessed and archived on the scanner console during the ongoing fetal MRI scan. The output image data quality was rated as good to acceptable for interpretation. The additional retrospective testing of the pipeline on 83 0.55T datasets demonstrated stable reconstruction quality for low-field MRI. ConclusionThe proposed pipeline allows scanner-based prospective motion correction for low-field fetal MRI. The main novel components of this work are the compilation of automated fetal and body D/SVR methods into one combined pipeline, the first application of 3D reconstruction methods to 0.55T T2-weighted data, and the online integration into the scanner environment.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Vendor-neutral sequences (VENUS) and fully transparent workflows improve inter-vendor reproducibility of quantitative MRI 96%
- Combined Angiographic, Structural and Perfusion Radial Imaging using Arterial Spin Labeling 96%
- Offline Reconstruction of Diffusion MRI Acquisitions for Comparison Between Complex PCA-based and AI-based Denoising 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Monash DaCRA fPET-fMRI: A DAtaset for Comparison of Radiotracer Administration for high temporal resolution functional FDG-PET 92%
- CAT - A Computational Anatomy Toolbox for the Analysis of Structural MRI Data 90%
- Comparing Linear and Nonlinear Finite Element Models of Vertebral Strength Across the Thoracolumbar Spine: A Benchmark from Density-Calibrated Computed Tomography 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Calgary Normative Study: Study Design Of A Prospective Longitudinal Study To Characterize Potential Quantitative Mr Biomarkers Over The Adult Lifespan 87%
- Response of the Myocardium to Hypertrophic Conditions in the Adult Population: The Prospective Observational REMODEL Cohort Study Protocol 86%
- Protocol for the development and validation of a machine-learning based tool for predicting the risk of hypertriglyceridemia in critically-ill patients receiving propofol sedation 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- A preliminary attempt to harmonize using physics-constrained deep neural networks for multisite and multiscanner MRI datasets (PhyCHarm) 96%
- Decoding the microstructural properties of white matter using realistic models 95%
- Subcortical Segmentation of the Fetal Brain in 3D Ultrasound using Deep Learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated cervix biometry, volumetry and normative models for 3D motion-corrected T2-weighted 0.55-3T fetal MRI during 2nd and 3rd trimesters 96%
- An in-vivo study of BOLD laminar responses as a function of echo time and static magnetic field strength 95%
- A multimodal computational pipeline for 3D histology of the human brain 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.