Back

A deep intronic variant in MME causes autosomal recessive Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy through aberrant splicing

Grosz, B. R.; Parmar, J. M.; Ellis, M.; Bryen, S.; Simons, C.; Reis, A. L. M.; Stevanovski, I.; Deveson, I. W.; Nicholson, G.; Laing, N.; Wallis, M.; Ravenscroft, G.; Kumar, K. R.; Vucic, S.; Kennerson, M. L.

2024-04-24 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.04.22.24306048
Show abstract

BackgroundLoss-of-function variants in MME (membrane metalloendopeptidase) are a known cause of recessive Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy (CMT). A deep intronic variant, MME c.1188+428A>G (NM_000902.5), was identified through whole genome sequencing (WGS) of two Australian families with recessive inheritance of axonal CMT using the seqr platform. MME c.1188+428A>G was detected in a homozygous state in Family 1, and in a compound heterozygous state with a known pathogenic MME variant (c.467del; p.Pro156Leufs*14) in Family 2. AimsWe aimed to determine the pathogenicity of the MME c.1188+428A>G variant through segregation and splicing analysis. MethodsThe splicing impact of the deep intronic MME variant c.1188+428A>G was assessed using an in vitro exon-trapping assay. ResultsThe exon-trapping assay demonstrated that the MME c.1188+428A>G variant created a novel splice donor site resulting in the inclusion of an 83 bp pseudoexon between MME exons 12 and 13. The incorporation of the pseudoexon into MME transcript is predicted to lead to a coding frameshift and premature termination codon (PTC) in MME exon 14 (p.Ala397ProfsTer47). This PTC is likely to result in nonsense mediated decay (NMD) of MME transcript leading to a pathogenic loss-of-function. InterpretationTo our knowledge, this is the first report of a pathogenic deep intronic MME variant causing CMT. This is of significance as deep intronic variants are missed using whole exome sequencing screening methods. Individuals with CMT should be reassessed for deep intronic variants, with splicing impacts being considered in relation to the potential pathogenicity of variants.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 0.6%
15.7%
2
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 1%
11.4%
3
Human Mutation
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 0.5%
4.8%
5
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 2%
4.6%
6
Movement Disorders
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
npj Genomic Medicine
based on 18 papers
Top 0.4%
3.0%
8
Journal of Medical Genetics
based on 22 papers
Top 0.5%
2.6%
9
Brain
based on 69 papers
Top 4%
2.5%
10
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
based on 39 papers
Top 0.8%
2.4%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
12
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
1.6%
13
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
based on 15 papers
Top 0.9%
1.6%
15
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 31%
1.6%
16
European Journal of Human Genetics
based on 25 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
17
Human Genetics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 77%
1.3%
19
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
20
Human Genomics
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
23
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 96%
0.7%
24
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 11%
0.7%