Back

Evaluation of the protective efficacy of OlysetPlus ceiling nets for reduction of malaria incidence in children in Homa Bay County, Kenya: a cluster-randomized controlled study protocol

Ko, Y. K.; Kagaya, W.; Omondi, P.; Musyoka, K. B.; Okai, T.; Chan, C. W.; Kongere, J.; Opiyo, V.; Oginga, J.; Mbugua, S.; Kanoi, B.; Kanamori, M.; Yoneoka, D.; Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, ; Keitany, K.; Songok, E.; Okomo, G.; Minakawa, N.; Gitaka, J.; Kaneko, A.

2024-04-22 public and global health
10.1101/2024.04.20.24306116 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionMalaria is still a major health problem in sub-Saharan Africa, where 98% of global malaria mortality occurs. In addition, the spread of Plasmodium falciparum with partial artemisinin resistance in East Africa and beyond is a great concern. The establishment of more effective vector control, in addition to the current long-lasting insecticide-treated net (LLIN) distribution program, is an urgent task in these areas. One novel vector control candidate is the Olyset(R)Plus ceiling nets which can overcome the problems of variations in net use behaviors and metabolic resistance to insecticide in vectors. Our preliminary study suggests the protective efficacy and high acceptability of this tool. With this proposed second trial, we aim to evaluate the impact of this tool in a different eco-epidemiological setting in the lake endemic region of Kenya. MethodsA cluster randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the impact of Olyset(R)Plus ceiling nets in Ndhiwa Sub-County, Homa Bay County, Kenya. A total of 44 clusters will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group (Olyset(R)Plus ceiling nets) and the control group. The assignment will be accomplished through covariate-constrained randomization of clusters. For the primary outcome of clinical malaria incidence, 38 children from each cluster will be enrolled in a cohort and followed for 18 months. We will also evaluate the effects of the intervention on entomological indicators as well as its acceptance by communities and cost-effectiveness. Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was provided by the Mount Kenya University Institutional Scientific Ethics Review Committee. Study results will be shared with study participants and communities, the Homa Bay County Government and the Kenya National Malaria Control Programme. Results will also be disseminated through publications, conferences and workshops to help the development of novel malaria control strategies in other malaria-endemic countries. Trial registrationUMIN000053873 Administrative information O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@773f4dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@dce9e8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@180a0a3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b248c6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c7c737_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL C_TBL Strength and limitations of this studyO_LIThis study is a cluster-randomized controlled trial (CRCT) to evaluate the efficacy of the Olyset(R)Plus ceiling net as a novel vector control tool and a complement to current malaria control tools in sub-Saharan Africa. C_LIO_LIThis marks the second CRCT of the Olyset(R)Plus ceiling net intervention in the lake endemic region of Kenya, expanding the evidence base to a different eco-epidemiological setting from the previous CRCT, where promising results were observed on Mfangano Island. C_LIO_LICollaboration with local Kenyan institutions such as the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP), the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), and Homa Bay County from the research planning stage is one of the strengths of this trial, allowing for a seamless transition from research implementation in the field to policy development. C_LIO_LIOne of the anticipated limitations is the possible contamination between intervention and control clusters because we will not set a buffer zone due to the geographical proximity of each cluster. We will try to account for such contamination effects by integrating spatial data into our statistical model. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.