Back

Moving from GWAS signals to rare functional variation in inflammatory bowel disease through application of GenePy2 as a potential DNA biomarker

Cheng, G.; Ashton, J.; Collins, A.; Bettie, M.; Ennis, S.

2024-04-20 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.04.19.24306093 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesWe adopt a weighted variant burden score GenePy2.0 for the UK Biobank phase 2 cohort of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), to explore potential genomic biomarkers underpinning IBDs known associations. DesignNucleating from IBD GWAS signals, we identified 794 GWAS loci, including target genes/LD-blocks (LDBs) based on linkage-disequilibrium (LD) and functional mapping. We calculated GenePy2.0-a burden score of target regions integrating variants with CADDPhred>15 weighted by deleteriousness and zygosity. Collating with other burden-based test, GenePy-based Mann-Whitney-U tests on cases/controls with varying extreme scores were used. Significance-levels and effect sizes were used for tuning the optimal GenePy thresholds for discriminating patients from controls. Individuals binarized GenePy status (above or below threshold) of candidate regions, was subject to itemset association test via the sparse Apriori algorithm. ResultsA tailored IBD cohort was curated (nCrohns_Disease(CD)=891, nUlcerative_Colitis(UC)=1409, nControls=60118). Analysing 885 unified target regions (794 GWAS loci and 104 monogenic genes with 13 overlaps), the GenePy approach detected statistical significance (permutation p<5.65x10-5) in 35 regions of CD and 25 of UC targets exerting risk and protective effects on the disease. Large effect sizes were observed, e.g. CYLD-AS1 (Mann-Whitney-{square}=0.89[CI:0.78-0.96]) in CD/controls with the top 1% highest scores of the gene. Itemset association learning further highlighted an intriguing signal whereby GenePy status of IL23R and NOD2 were mutually exclusive in CD but always co-occurring in controls. ConclusionGenePy score per IBD patient detected deleterious variation of large effect underpinning known IBD associations and proved itself a promising tool for genomic biomarker discovery. What is already known on this topicInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a genetically heterogeneous disease with both common polygenic, and rare monogenic, presentations. Previous studies have identified known genetic variants associated with disease. What this study addsA genomic biomarker tool, tailored for large cohort, GenePy2.0 is developed. Its rank-based test is more powerful than mutation-burden based test in validating known associations and finding new associations of IBD. We identified large risk and protective effects of pathogenic genes/loci in IBD, including expanding previous associations to wider genomic regions. How this study might affect research, practice or policyGenePy2.0 facilitates analysis of diseases with genetic heterogeneity and facilitates personalised genomic analysis on patients. The revealed genetic landscape of IBD captures both risk and protective effects of rare pathogenic variants, alongside more common variation. This, could provide a fresh angle for future targeted therapies in specific groups of patients.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
6
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
8
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
11
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
The Lancet Rheumatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
19
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
29
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
30
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%