Back

Extended period of selection for antimicrobial resistance due to persistency of antimicrobials in broilers

Swinkels, A. F.; Berendsen, B. J. A.; Fischer, E. A. J.; Zomer, A. L.; Wagenaar, J. A.

2024-04-18 microbiology
10.1101/2024.04.18.590069 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobials can select for antimicrobial resistant bacteria. After treatment the active compound is excreted through urine and faeces. As some antimicrobials are chemically stable and very persistent, recirculation of sub-inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobials may occur due to coprophagic behaviour of animals such as chickens. The persistence of three antimicrobials over time and their potential effects on antimicrobial resistance were determined in four groups of broilers. Groups were left untreated (control) or were treated with amoxicillin (non-persistent), doxycycline or enrofloxacin (persistent). Antimicrobials were extracted from the faecal samples and concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS. We determined the resistome genotypically using shotgun metagenomics and phenotypically by using Escherichia coli as indicator microorganism. Up to 37 days after treatment, persistent antimicrobials (doxycycline and enrofloxacin) had concentrations in faeces equal to or higher than the minimal selective concentration (MSC), in contrast to the non-persistent (amoxicillin) treatment. The amoxicillin treatment showed a significant difference (p [≤] 0.01 and p [≤] 0.0001) in the genotypic resistance only directly after treatment. On the other hand, the doxycycline treatment showed approximately 52% increase in phenotypic and a significant difference (p [≤] 0.05 and p [≤] 0.0001) in genotypic resistance throughout the trial. Furthermore, the enrofloxacin treatment resulted in a complete enrofloxacin-resistant E. coli population but the quantity of resistance genes was similar to the control group, likely because resistance is mediated by point mutations. Based on our findings, we suggest that persistency of antimicrobials should be taken into consideration in the assessment of priority classification of antimicrobials in livestock.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.5%
3
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
8
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
9
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
10
Animal Microbiome
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
13
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.0%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
18
Gut Microbes
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
19
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
npj Antimicrobials and Resistance
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
21
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
22
Poultry Science
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%