Rhizobacteria inoculation of plants for reducing insect pests: A meta-analysis on insect behaviour and fitness
Zytynska, S. E.; Parker, M.; Sanchez-Mahecha, O.
Show abstract
Microbial communities in the plant rhizosphere--the soil region closely associated with plant roots-- play critical roles in shaping plant growth, defence, fitness, and ecosystem processes. Inoculation of plants with specific rhizobacteria strains has shown promising potential for increasing crop yields. Rhizobacteria can also induce plant defences, resulting in reduced insect growth and reproduction, and can manipulate plant biochemistry to alter insect host-choice and recruit natural enemies of the insects. We present a meta-analysis examining the impact of rhizobacteria inoculation of plants on insect fitness and behaviour. Our findings indicate that rhizobacteria inoculation generally reduces herbivore fitness and host choice behaviours. However, effect sizes varied significantly depending on type of herbivore (chewing versus sucking), plant host, and rhizobacterial species. Bacillus spp. showed stronger effects than the commonly studied Pseudomonas spp. Rhizobacteria notably reduced traits such as host choice, leaf consumption, survival, and reproduction of chewing herbivores, while primarily impacting sucking herbivores by reducing reproduction. Single-strain inoculants tended to perform better, especially for sucking herbivores, suggesting potential strain incompatibility issues with multi-strain inoculants. Furthermore, field trials showed less impact on insect fitness reduction compared to experiments under controlled conditions, possibly due to soil diversity and environmental factors affecting inoculant persistence. Despite, very limited experimental data, studies observed that rhizobacteria inoculation of plants can attract parasitoid wasps and predators to the plants. These results underscore the need for considering broader environmental interactions when developing effective rhizobacteria-based pest management strategies. Understanding specific and generalist rhizosphere interactions can aid in developing synthetic microbial communities with broad protective functions across various plants and environments.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Floral presence and flower identity alter cereal aphid endosymbiont communities on adjacent crops 94%
- Metabarcoding and ecological interaction networks for selecting candidate biological control agents 93%
- Evaluating the ecological impacts of pesticide seed treatments on arthropod communities in a grain crop rotation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insect-habitat-plant interaction networks provide guidelines to mitigate the risk of transmission of Xylella fastidiosa to grapevine in Southern France 91%
- Diversification in the microlepidopteran genus Mompha (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Momphidae) is explained more by tissue specificity than host plant family. 90%
- Host-specific gene expression as a tool for introduction success in populations of generalist Naupactus parthenogenetic weevils 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common resistance mechanisms are deployed by plants against sap-feeding herbivorous insects: insights from a meta-analysis and systematic review 95%
- Survey of bacteria associated with western corn rootworm life stages reveals no difference between insects reared in different soils 92%
- Exploring bycatch diversity of organisms in whole genome sequencing of Erebidae moths (Lepidoptera) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population-specific effect of Wolbachia on the cost of fungal infection in spider mites 91%
- Manduca sexta experience high parasitoid pressures in the field but minor fitness costs of consuming plant secondary compounds 91%
- Oxidative stress delays development and alters gene function in the agricultural pest moth, Helicoverpa armigera 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.