Back

Youth Psychotic Experiences: Diagnostic Associations and Evaluation of the CAPE-16

Birkenas, V.; Parekh, P.; Hegemann, L.; Bakken, N. R.; Frei, E.; Jaholkowski, P.; Smeland, O. B.; Susser, E.; Rodriguez, K.; Tesfaye, M.; Andreassen, O.; Havdahl, A.; Soenderby, I. E.

2024-04-18 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.04.18.24306017 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAdolescent self-reported psychotic experiences are associated with mental illness and could help guide prevention strategies. The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) was developed over 20 years ago. In a rapidly changing society, where new generations of adolescents are growing up in an increasingly digital world, it is crucial to ensure high reliability and validity of the questionnaire. MethodsIn this observational validation study, we used unique transgenerational questionnaire and health registry data from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort, a population-based pregnancy cohort. Adolescents, aged [~]14 years, responded to the CAPE-16 (n = 18,835) and fathers to the CAPE-9 questionnaire (n = 28,793). We investigated the psychometric properties of CAPE-16 through factor analyses, measurement invariance testing across biological sex, response before/during the COVID-19 pandemic, and generations (comparison with fathers), and examined associations with later psychiatric diagnoses. OutcomesOne third (33{middle dot}4%) of adolescents reported lifetime psychotic experiences. We confirmed a three-factor structure (paranoia, bizarre thoughts, and hallucinations) of CAPE-16, and observed good scale reliability of the distress and frequency subscales ({omega} = {middle dot}86 and {middle dot}90). CAPE-16 measured psychotic experiences were invariant to biological sex and pandemic status. CAPE-9 was non-invariant across generations, with items related to understanding of the digital world (electrical influences) prone to bias. CAPE-16 sum scores were associated with a subsequent psychiatric diagnosis, particularly psychotic disorders (frequency: OR = 2{middle dot}06; 97{middle dot}5% CI = 1{middle dot}70-2{middle dot}46; distress: OR = 1{middle dot}93; 97{middle dot}5% CI = 1{middle dot}63-2{middle dot}26). InterpretationCAPE-16 showed robust psychometric properties across sex and pandemic status, and sum scores were associated with subsequent psychiatric diagnoses, particularly psychotic disorders. These findings suggest that with certain adjustments, CAPE-16 could have value as a screening tool for adolescents in the modern, digital world. FundingEuropean Unions Horizon 2020 Programme, Research Council of Norway, South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, NIMH, and the KG Jebsen Stiftelsen.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.3%
2
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.2%
3
Schizophrenia Bulletin
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
5
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.3%
6
JAMA Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
7
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
9
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
10
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
13
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
American Journal of Psychiatry
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.6%
17
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
18
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
19
European Psychiatry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
20
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Nature Mental Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
23
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
Schizophrenia Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
27
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
International Journal of Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%