Back

Smart youth: sociodemographic factors, usage patterns, and self-reported vs. actual smartphone addiction among secondary school students

Burzynska, J.; Rekas, M.

2024-04-22 public and global health
10.1101/2024.04.17.24305981 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSmartphone addiction is a growing social problem especially in young mobile users. This study investigated indicators of smartphone use, smartphone addiction, and their associations with demographic and behavior-related variables in young people. Methods460 participants were secondary school students (Mage = 17,10, SDage = 0.92, 51.1% males, 52.4% high school students), took part in an anonymous questionnaire consisting of the following elements: the Mobile Phone Addiction Assessment Questionnaire (KBUTK), original questions regarding problematic smartphones usage, along with a subjective assessment of the use of such devices. Logistic regression model using forward stepwise method was used to characterize a typical smartphone user. Smartphone addiction was measured using KBUTK. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with smartphone addiction. ResultsA total of 460 participants admitted to using a smartphone. Gender, age, type of school, place of living influenced the ways respondents used their smartphones. Being female (OR = 5.80; p < 0.0001), sixteen-year-old (OR = 0,41; p = 0.0456), and student of technical school (OR = 2.66; p = 0.0025) turned out to be the characteristics of a typical smartphone user. 21.7% of adolescents considered themselves addicted to smartphones, 22.2% admitted that they had problems with face-to-face relationships and girls significantly more often than boys (61.8% vs. 51.5%) neglected home or school duties as a result of using a smartphone. The overall rate of smartphone addiction was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) among girls (2.31 pts) than boys (2.03 pts), and correlated positively with the perception of being a smartphone addict (rho = 0.223; p < 0.0001). Addiction to smartphones was also significantly more common among students of technical schools, and respondents living in blocks of flats. ConclusionsThe way adolescents used smartphones differed depending on gender, age and type of school. Interventions for reducing the negative effects of smartphone use should take into account these context, as well as education both adolescents and their parents.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.5%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.9%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
8
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
15
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
16
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%