Can Large Language Models Provide Emergency Medical Help Where There Is No Ambulance? A Comparative Study on Large Language Model Understanding of Emergency Medical Scenarios in Resource-Constrained Settings
Mensah, P. B.; Quao, N. S.; Project Genie Clinician Evaluation Group,
Show abstract
The capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced since their popularization a few years ago. The healthcare sector operates on, and generates a large volume of data annually and thus, there is a growing focus on the applications of LLMs within this sector. There are a few medicine-oriented evaluation datasets and benchmarks for assessing the performance of various LLMs in clinical scenarios; however, there is a paucity of information on the real-world usefulness of LLMs in context-specific scenarios in resourceconstrained settings. In this study, 16 iterations of a decision support tool for medical emergencies using 4 distinct generalized LLMs were constructed, alongside a combination of 4 Prompt Engineering techniques: In-Context Learning with 5-shot prompting (5SP), chain-of-thought prompting (CoT), self-questioning prompting (SQP), and a stacking of self-questioning prompting and chain-of-thought (SQCT). In total 428 model responses were quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated by 22 clinicians familiar with the medical scenarios and background contexts. Our study highlights the benefits of In-Context Learning with few-shot prompting, and the utility of the relatively novel self-questioning prompting technique. We also demonstrate the benefits of combining various prompting techniques to elicit the best performance of LLMs in providing contextually applicable health information. We also highlight the need for continuous human expert verification in the development and deployment of LLM-based health applications, especially in use cases where context is paramount.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 94%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 93%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Semantic Similarity Methods for Comparison of Text-derived Phenotype Profiles 93%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 92%
- Implicit bias in Critical Care Data: Factors affecting sampling frequencies and missingness patterns of clinical and biological variables in ICU Patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model Integrated with the Clinical Workflow for Inpatient Discharge Date Prediction 94%
- Large Language Models in Real-World Clinical Workflows: A Systematic Review of Applications and Implementation 94%
- Listening to mental health crisis needs at scale: using Natural Language Processing to understand and evaluate a mental health crisis text messaging service 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.