Back

Healthy carriage of Salmonella within cattle lymph nodes is a key source of ground beef contamination with strains of clinical significance

Delgado-Suarez, E. J.; Garcia-Meneses, A. V.; Ponce-Hernandez, E. A.; Hernandez-Perez, C. F.; Rubio-Lozano, M. S.; Ballesteros-Nova, N. E.; Soberanis-Ramos, O.

2024-04-20 genomics
10.1101/2024.04.16.589703 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study assessed the genetic relatedness, evolutionary dynamics, and virulence profile of Salmonella isolated from lymph nodes and ground beef from apparently healthy cattle over two years. For this purpose, we used a set of isolates of nine different serovars: Anatum (n=23), Reading (n=22), Typhimurium (n=10), London (n=9), Kentucky (n=6), Fresno (n=4), Give, Muenster, and monophasic 1,4,[5],12:i- (n=1 each). These isolates were subjected to whole genome sequencing, and assembled and annotated genomes were used for downstream bioinformatic analyses. Although lymph nodes and ground beef were collected and analyzed separately, we still observed clonality between isolates from both sources. This finding suggests that some Salmonella circulating in the gut may reach the lymphatic system, creating a dual reservoir for ground beef contamination. We also found evidence of Salmonella persistence across cattle cohorts, as we observed clonality between isolates collected in different years. Variation in the virulence and pathogenicity island profiles was limited, with minor differences that could not be associated with attenuated virulence in the bovine host. Conversely, isolates of all serovars, except Fresno, were genetically close to strains involved in human salmonellosis in different countries, highlighting the risk to public health posed by strains associated with the carrier state in cattle. Further research is needed to reveal the mechanisms by which Salmonella causes subclinical infections in cattle and persists for long periods within farm environments.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
2
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
7
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
9
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
11
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
13
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
21
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Infection and Immunity
103 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
30
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%