Bridge Capture Permits Cost-Efficient, Rapid and Sensitive Molecular Precision Diagnostics
Adamusova, S.; Korkiakoski, A.; Hirvonen, T.; Musku, A.; Rantasalo, T.; Laine, N.; Laine, J.; Blomster, J.; Pursiheimo, J.-P.; Tamminen, M.
Show abstract
Liquid biopsies are a less invasive alternative to tissue biopsies that have been the mainstay of cancer diagnostics to date. Recently, the quantification of mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been gaining popularity. Targeted NGS can be achieved through various library preparation methods, each with distinct advantages and limitations. Here we introduce Bridge Capture, a novel technology that goes beyond the advantages of market-leading liquid biopsy technologies, eliminating the need to compromise between scalability, cost-efficiency, sensitivity, or panel size. We compared Bridge Capture to leading commercial technologies currently available in cancer diagnostics; Archer LIQUIDPlex and AmpliSeq Cancer HotSpot Panel v2 for Illumina(R). Of all methods, Bridge Capture detected the lowest mutant allele frequency (MAF) on matched contrived colorectal biospecimens mimicking ctDNA. Next, we demonstrated the capability of Bridge Capture to effectively utilize the sequencing capacity, permitting affordable and sensitive variant detection in smaller laboratories, while delivering significant cost savings for central laboratories. Additionally, we demonstrated the reproducibility of Bridge Capture by a high correlation between the results from two independent laboratories. These results highlight the methods portability and suitability for kit use in entirely new settings. Moreover, we presented ease of automation and minimal hands-on time of Bridge Capture. Owing to its unique design, the Bridge Capture is compatible with the most commonly used NGS platforms. Taken together, Bridge Capture is cost efficient, simple, rapid and sensitive cancer diagnostics tool that significantly improves the detection of mutations in liquid biopsies.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Nanopore Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: Comparison of Short and Long PCR-tiling Amplicon Protocols 94%
- Performance of amplicon and capture based next-generation sequencing approaches for the epidemiological surveillance of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 and other variants of concern. 94%
- Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical performance of a highly sensitive system to detect gene variants using next-generation sequencing for lung cancer companion diagnostics 95%
- Analytical performance and concordance with next-generation sequencing of a rapid multiplexed dPCR panel for the detection of actionable DNA and RNA biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer 94%
- A new method for improving extraction efficiency and purity of urine and plasma cell-free DNA 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Combination of hotspot mutations with methylation and fragmentomic profiles to enhance Multi-Cancer Early Detection 94%
- Restriction site associated DNA sequencing for tumour mutation burden estimation and mutation signature analysis 90%
- Added-value of whole exome and RNA Sequencing in advanced and refractory cancer patients with no molecular-based treatment recommendation based on a 90-gene panel 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.