Predicting congenital syphilis: Using machine learning to enhance disease management and control
Rocha, E.; Morais, C. M. d.; Teixeira, I. V.; Neto, W. B.; Lynn, T.; Endo, P. T.
Show abstract
ObjectiveSexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) present significant challenges to global public health, affecting physical and mental well-being and straining healthcare systems and economies. This study aims to enhance the predictive performance of models for congenital syphilis prediction by incorporating additional information obtained during gestational follow-up. Building upon the work of Teixeira et al. [1], which utilizes clinical and sociodemographic data, our model was enriched with results from venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) and rapid tests for congenital syphilis conducted on pregnant women. MethodThe dataset utilized in this study comprised 47,604 records spanning the period from 2013 to 2022, with 27 attributes collected from pregnant women enrolled in the Mae Coruja Pernambucana Program in Pernambuco, Brazil. Among these attributes, we included clinical and sociodemographic factors, as well as results from venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) and rapid tests for congenital syphilis. ResultsOur proposed model surpassed Teixeiras models exhibiting higher specificity (94.74%) and a slight increase in sensitivity (70.37%). ConclusionsOur study highlights the value of incorporating additional information from VDRL and rapid tests into models for predicting congenital syphilis. The combined approach involving both clinical, sociodemographic, and test result data enhances the accuracy of predictions thereby facilitating better informed healthcare decisions at different stages of pregnancy. This approach also holds significant potential in combating and managing congenital syphilis by providing assistance to health system decision makers and public policymakers. As a result, it can ultimately enhance the overall outcomes of maternal and child health and contribute to disease control.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 95%
- Identification of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Probability from Imbalanced Medical Survey Data: An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with Explainable AI (XAI) Insights 94%
- A machine-learning Approach for Stress Detection Using Wearable Sensors in Free-living Environments 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers 95%
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 93%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Measuring the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic at a city level: An agent-based computational modeling study of the City of Natal 94%
- Implementation and Evaluation of Obstetric Early Warning Systems in tertiary care hospitals in Nigeria 92%
- Acceptability and associated factors of indoor residual spraying for Malaria control by households in Luangwa district of Zambia: A multilevel analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.