Advancing Bloodstream Infection Prediction Using Explanable Artificial Intelligence Framework
Bopche, R.; Tuset, L. G.; Afset, J. E.; Ehrnström, B.; Damas, J. K.; Nytro, O.
Show abstract
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) represent a critical public health concern, primarily due to their rapid progression and severe implications such as sepsis and septic shock. This study introduces an innovative Explanable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) framework, leveraging historical electronic health records (EHRs) to enhance BSI prediction. Unlike traditional models that rely heavily on real-time clinical data, our XAI-based approach utilizes a comprehensive dataset incorporating demographic data, laboratory results, and full medical histories from St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway, covering 35,591 patients between 2015 and 2020. We developed models to differentiate between high-risk and low-risk BSI cases effectively, optimizing healthcare resource allocation and potentially reducing healthcare costs. Our results demonstrate superior predictive accuracy, particularly the tree-based models, which significantly outperformed contemporary models in both specificity and sensitivity metrics. Author SummaryIn this research, we have developed a new tool that uses artificial intelligence to better predict bloodstream infections, which can lead to serious conditions like sepsis if not quickly identified and treated. It is the first of its kind framework that analyzes past health records and helps identify patients who are at high risk of infection more accurately than existing tools. Unlike existing tools our framework can be implemented at any stage of the patient trajectory and is the only framework to achieve good accuracy without the use of intimate patient features such as vital signs. This ability could enable doctors to prioritize care more pre-emptively, effectively, potentially saving lives and reducing unnecessary medical tests. Our approach is designed to be easily understood and used by both medical professionals and those with little technical expertise, making it a valuable addition to hospital systems.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 97%
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 96%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 96%
- Can the application of machine learning to electronic health records guide antibiotic prescribing decisions for suspected urinary tract infection in the Emergency Department? 94%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning Interpretability Methods to Characterize the Importance of Hematologic Biomarkers in Prognosticating Patients with Suspected Infection 97%
- AI-MET: A Deep Learning-based Clinical Decision Support System for Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Endemic Typhus 96%
- Improving irregular temporal modeling by integrating synthetic data to the electronic medical record using conditional GANs: a case study of fluid overload prediction in the intensive care unit 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records 96%
- Modeling physician variability to prioritize relevant medical record information 96%
- Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: A case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.