A Role For Electrocardiograms in Aortic Stenosis Screening: A Retrospective Trial
Pulaski, M.; Newadkar, A.; Richie, I.; Urnes, C.; Joseph, J.; Ho, I.; Matthews, R.; Zaman, J. A. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundAortic stenosis affects 1 in 50 adults over age 65 and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Machine learning has identified an association between right-sided precordial U waves and moderate to severe aortic stenosis. No study has explored the role of ECG screening by primary care physicians for patients with unknown aortic stenosis status. MethodsA retrospective single center cohort analysis performed by non-cardiologists identified right-sided precordial U waves on ECGs in fifty adults ages 65 to 89. Following identification, reviewers were unblinded to echocardiograms to determine whether there was an association between right-sided precordial U waves and aortic stenosis severity. Fifty age- and gender-matched patients without right-sided precordial U waves comprised the control group. ResultsChi-squared analysis revealed a significant association between right-sided precordial U waves and severity of aortic stenosis ({chi}2 = 16.77, df = 3, p < 0.001). Multinomial logistic regressions demonstrated no relationship between categorical SBP (< 125, 126 - 145, > 145) and aortic stenosis (p = 0.35), but increasing categorical age (65-73, 74-81, 82-89) was associated with moderate to severe aortic stenosis (p = 0.002). ConclusionsOur data highlights right-sided precordial U wave identification by non-cardiologists as a novel objective adjunct to the physical examination in detection of a medical condition which portends significant morbidity and mortality if left untreated. These findings motivate a prospective randomized clinical trial in the utility of right-sided precordial U waves in screening for aortic stenosis in primary care settings.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 95%
- Right Heart Remodeling After Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients with Pulmonary Atresia or Critical Stenosis with Intact Ventricular Septum 95%
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 96%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 95%
- Sex-Related Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable Valves: Insights from the OPERA-TAVI Registry 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 94%
- Effectiveness of An Impedance Cardiography Guided Treatment Strategy to Improve Blood Pressure Control in A Real-World Setting: Results from A Pilot Pragmatic Clinical Trial 93%
- The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiology Services 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved Hemodynamic Performance and Reduced Paravalvular Regurgitation with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA Valve: A Propensity-Matched Single-Center TAVR Study 95%
- Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Troponin Elevation in COVID-19 94%
- Algorithm for Predicting Valvular Heart Disease from Heart Sounds in an Unselected Cohort 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus: A Randomized Clinical Trial 95%
- Comparison of Long-term Outcomes of Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment for Asymptomatic Severe Mitral Regurgitation: A Propensity Analysis 93%
- Standardized Data Elements for Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Consensus Report from the Pulmonary Embolism Research Collaborative 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.