Deep learning models to predict mammographic density jointly on standard dose and low dose images
Squires, S.; Mackenzie, A.; Evans, D. G.; Howell, S. J.; Astley, S. M.
Show abstract
ObjectivesMammographic density is associated with increased risk of developing breast cancer. Automated estimation of density in women below normal screening age would enable earlier risk stratification. We are piloting the use of low dose mammograms combined with models that can make accurate mammographic density estimates. MethodsThree models were trained on a joint set (107,619) of standard dose mammograms with associated density scores and their simulated low dose counterparts such that the models made predictions on standard and low dose mammograms. A second set of models was trained separately on the standard and simulated low dose mammograms. All models were tested on a held-out set from the training data and an independent dataset with 294 pairs of standard and real low dose mammograms. ResultsThe root mean squared errors (RMSE) between the model predictions and density scores on standard and simulated low dose images were 8.26 (8.16-8.36) and 8.27 (8.17-8.38) respectively. The RMSE between predictions on standard and simulated low dose images for the jointly trained models was 1.91 (1.88-1.96). The RMSE of the predictions on the real low dose images compared to the standard dose images is 3.79 (2.75-4.99). ConclusionsDeep learning models make density predictions on low dose images with similar quality as on standard dose images. Such automated analysis of low dose mammograms could contribute to accurate breast cancer risk estimation in younger women enabling stratification for further monitoring and preventative therapy. Advances in knowledgeMammographic density can be estimated in low dose mammograms with similar quality to standard dose mammograms.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SCU-Net: A deep learning method for segmentation and quantification of breast arterial calcifications on mammograms 94%
- PSMA-Hornet: fully-automated, multi-target segmentation of healthy organs in PSMA PET/CT images 93%
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Breast density prediction from low and standard dose mammograms using deep learning: effect of image resolution and model training approach on prediction quality 98%
- Model uncertainty estimates for deep learning mammographic density prediction using ordinal and classification approaches 94%
- Recent advances in the clinical applications of machine learning in proton therapy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- “E Pluribus Unum”: Prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology (C3RO) Crowdsourced Initiative for Multi-Observer Segmentation 94%
- Coronary artery calcium mass measurement based on integrated intensity and volume fraction techniques 94%
- The Effect of Image Resolution on Automated Classification of Chest X-rays 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 94%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 93%
- Internal calibration for opportunistic computed tomography muscle density analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.