Development and Internal Validation of Models Predicting the Health Insurance Status of Participants in the German National Cohort
Hrudey, I.; Swart, E.; Baurecht, H.; Becher, H.; Damms-Machado, A.; Hoffmann, W.; Jöckel, K.-H.; Kartschmit, N.; Katzke, V.; Keil, T.; Kollhorst, B.; Leitzmann, M.; Meinke-Franze, C.; Michels, K. B.; Mikolajczyk, R.; Niedermaier, T.; Pigeot, I.; Schipf, S.; Schmidt, B.; Walter, B.; Willich, S.; Wolff, R.; Stallmann, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn Germany, all citizens must purchase health insurance, in either statutory (SHI) or private health insurance (PHI). Because of the division into SHI and PHI, person insurances status is an important variable for studies in the context of public health research. In the German National Cohort (NAKO), the variable on self-reported health insurance status of the participants has a high proportion of missing values (55.4%). The aim of our study was to develop and internally validate models to predict the health insurance status of NAKO baseline survey participants in order to replace missing values. In this respect, our research interest was focused on the question to which extent socio-demographic characteristics are suitable for predicting health insurance status. MethodsWe developed two prediction models including 53,796 participants to estimate the probability that a participant is either member of a SHI (model 1) or PHI (model 2). We identified eight predictors by literature research: occupation, income, education, sex, age, employment status, residential area, and marital status. The predictive performance was determined in the internal validation considering discrimination and calibration. Discrimination was assessed based on the Area Under the Curve (AUC) and the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration was assessed based on the calibration slope and calibration plot. ResultsIn model 1, the AUC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.91-0.92) and the calibration slope was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.97-0.97). Model 2 had an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.90-0.91) and a calibration slope of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.97-0.97). Based on the calculated performance parameters both models turned out to show an almost ideal discrimination and calibration. Employment status and household income and to a lesser extent educational level, age, sex, marital status, and residential area are suitable for predicting health insurance status. ConclusionsSocio-demographic characteristics especially employment status and household income assessed at NAKOs baseline were suitable for predicting the statutory and private health insurance status. However, before applying the prediction models in other studies, an external validation in population-based studies is recommended.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of self-reported health status during COVID-19 lockdown among surveyed Ecuadorian population: a cross sectional study 95%
- Socio-demographic characteristics and their relation to medical service consumption among elderly in Israel during the COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 compared to the corresponding period in 2019 95%
- A country-wide health policy in Chile for deaf adults using cochlear implants: analysis of health determinants and social impacts 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 95%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related control measures on cancer diagnosis in Catalonia:A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 5 million people. 93%
- Prevalence and causes of vision impairment in Norwest Portugal: a capture and recapture study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Excess respiratory, circulatory, neoplasm and other mortality rates during the Covid-19 pandemic in the EU and their implications 93%
- Covid-19 and excess mortality rates not comparable across countries 93%
- Correlation of population mortality of COVID-19 and testing coverage: a comparison among 36 OECD countries and Taiwan 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Yet another lockdown? A large-scale study on people’s unwillingness to be confined during the first 5 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain 93%
- Testing the phenotypic decanalization hypothesis: social determinants of hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes in adult urban Argentinian population 92%
- Rapid Clinical Screening and Staging for COVID-19 Severe Outcome A Hospitalization Study in New York City 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.