Back

Consensus guideline for the management of patients with appendiceal tumors Part 1: Appendiceal tumors without peritoneal involvement

PSM Appendiceal Tumor Writing Group, ; PSM Appendiceal Tumor Consortium Group, ; Turaga, K. K.

2024-04-12 oncology
10.1101/2024.04.09.24305468 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAppendiceal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors which may be localized or disseminate throughout the peritoneum. Limited high quality clinical data exists and many practices have been extrapolated from colorectal cancer without validation in appendiceal cohorts. Many controversies exist regarding their treatment, and practices vary widely between centers and care settings. A national consensus update of best management practices for appendiceal malignancies was performed to better standardize care. MethodsThe 2018 Chicago consensus guideline was updated via modified Delphi consensus, performed over two rounds using nationally circulated surveys. Supporting evidence was evaluated using rapid systematic reviews. Key systemic therapy concepts were summarized by content experts. ResultsMost supporting literature consists of observational studies, but increasingly high-quality studies are becoming available to drive management. Two consensus-based pathways were generated for localized appendiceal tumors, one for epithelial mucinous neoplasms and another for appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Of 138 participants responding in the first round, 133 (96%) engaged in the second round. Over 90% consensus was achieved for all pathway blocks. Key points include minimizing intervention invasiveness where permitted by pathologic classification and margin status, and determining what margin and pathologic findings are indications for consideration of cytoreduction with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Surveillance and systemic therapy recommendations are also presented. ConclusionWith growing but still primarily observational evidence currently dictating care, these consensus recommendations provide expert guidance in the treatment of appendiceal tumors without peritoneal involvement.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
5
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
9
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
11
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
14
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
16
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
22
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%