Back

Profiling the intestinal microbiota, plasma bile acids and inflammation markers reveals novel associations in Crohn's disease and Ulcerative colitis.

Prast-Nielsen, S.; Granstrom, A.; Kiasat, A.; Ahlstrom, G.; Edfeldt, G.; Rautiainen, S.; Boulund, F.; Andersson, F. O.; Lindberg, J.; Schuppe-Koistinen, I.; Gustafsson, U. O.; Engstrand, L.

2024-04-11 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.04.08.588526 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and aimsOur study explores signatures for Crohns disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) reflecting the interplay between the intestinal microbiota, systemic inflammation, and plasma bile acid homeostasis. Methods1,257 individuals scheduled for colonoscopy were included and completed a comprehensive questionnaire. Individuals with IBD ( CD n=64 and UC n= 55), were age- and gender-matched to controls without findings during colonoscopy. Taxonomic profiles of the fecal microbiota and plasma profiles of inflammatory proteins and bile acids were used to build disease classifiers. Omics integration identified associations across datasets. ResultsB. hydrogenotrophica was associated with CD and C. eutactus, C. sp. CAG 167, B. cellulosilyticus, C. mitsuokai with controls. Ten inflammation markers were increased in CD, and eleven bile acids and derivatives were decreased in CD, while 7a-Hydroxy-3-oxo-4-cholestenoate (7-HOCA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) were increased compared to controls. In UC, commensals such as F. prausnitzii and A. muciniphila were depleted. CCL11, IL-17A, and TNF were increased in UC and associated to gut microbial changes. Correlations between taxa and bile acids were all positive. ConclusionsFor both CD and UC, taxonomic differences were primarily characterized by a reduction in commensal gut microbes which exhibited positive correlations with secondary bile acids and negative correlations with inflammation markers, potentially reflecting protective mechanisms of these commensal microbes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.