Back

CSsingle: A Unified Tool for Robust Decomposition of Bulk and Spatial Transcriptomic Data Across Diverse Single-Cell References

Shen, W.; Liu, C.; Hu, Y.; Lei, Y.; Wong, H.-S.; Wu, S.; Zhou, X. M.

2025-03-11 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.04.07.588458 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We introduce CSsingle, a novel method that enhances the decomposition of bulk and spatial transcriptomic (ST) data by addressing key challenges in cellular heterogeneity. CSsingle applies cell size correction using ERCC spike-in controls, enabling it to account for variations in RNA content between cell types and achieve accurate bulk data deconvolution. In addition, it enables fine-scale analysis for ST data, advancing our understanding of tissue architecture and cellular interactions, particularly in complex microenvironments. We provide a unified tool for integrating bulk and ST with scRNA-seq data, advancing the study of complex biological systems and disease processes. The benchmark results demonstrate that CSsingle outperforms existing methods in accuracy and robustness. Validation using more than 700 normal and diseased samples from gastroesophageal tissue reveals the predominant presence of mosaic columnar cells (MCCs), which exhibit a gastric and intestinal mosaic phenotype in Barretts esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), in contrast to their very low detectable levels in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and normal gastroesophageal tissue. We revealed a dynamic relationship between MCCs and squamous cells during immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-based treatment in EAC patients, suggesting MCC expression signatures as predictive and prognostic markers of immunochemotherapy outcomes. Our findings reveal the critical role of MCC in the treatment of EAC and its potential as a biomarker to predict outcomes of immunochemotherapy, providing insight into tumor epithelial plasticity to guide personalized immunotherapeutic strategies.

Published in Nucleic Acids Research (predicted rank #15) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.