Back

Landscape-scale endophytic community analyses in replicated grapevine stands reveal that dieback disease is not caused by specific fungal communities

Monod, V.; Hofstetter, V.; Viret, O.; Zufferey, V.; Gindro, K.; Croll, D.

2024-04-06 microbiology
10.1101/2024.04.05.588363 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tree diebacks are complex and multi-factorial diseases with suspected biotic and abiotic components. Microbiome effects on plant health are challenging to assess due to the complexity of fungal and bacterial communities. Grapevine wood dieback is the main threat to sustainable production worldwide and no causality with microbial species has been established. Here, we aimed to test the hypothesis that grapevine esca disease progression has reproducible drivers in the fungal species community. For this, we analyzed a set of 21 vineyards planted simultaneously with a single susceptible cultivar to provide replication at the landscape scale. We sampled a total of 496 plants across vineyards in two different years to perform deep amplicon sequencing analyses of the fungal communities inhabiting grapevine trunks. The communities were highly diverse with a total of 4,129 amplified sequence variants assigned to 697 distinct species. Individual plants varied in fungal community composition depending on the year of sampling, vineyard location, and disease status. However, we detect no specific fungal species driving symptom development across the vineyards contrary to long-standing expectations. Our study shows how landscape-scale replicated field surveys allow for powerful hypothesis-testing for complex dieback disease drivers and prioritize future research towards additional factors.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
2
Phytobiomes Journal
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
4
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
7
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
10
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
12
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
15
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
16
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
21
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
22
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
23
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
24
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
25
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
26
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
27
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
30
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%