Reliability and Validity of the Brief Attention and Mood Scale of 7 Items (BAMS-7): A Self-Administered, Online, and Real-World Measure
Madore, K. P.; Osman, A. M.; Kerlan, K. R.; Schafer, R. J.
Show abstract
I.Changes in technology, regulatory guidance, and COVID-19 have spurred an explosion in online studies in the social and clinical sciences. This surge has led to a need for brief and accessible instruments that are designed and validated specifically for self-administered, online use. Addressing this opportunity, the Brief Attention and Mood Scale of 7 Items (BAMS-7) was developed and validated in five cohorts across four studies to assess real-world attention and mood in one instrument. In Study 1, an exploratory factor analysis was run on responses from an initial nine-item survey in a very large, healthy, adult sample (N=75,019, ages 18-89 years). Two brief subscales comprising seven items total were defined and further characterized: one for Attention, the other for Mood. Study 2 established convergent validity with existing questionnaires in a separate sample (N=150). Study 3 demonstrated known-groups validity of each subscale using a large sample (N=58,411) of participants reporting a lifetime diagnosis of ADHD, anxiety, or depression, alongside the healthy sample of Study 1. The Attention subscale had superior discriminability for ADHD and the Mood subscale for anxiety and depression. Study 4 applied confirmatory factor analysis to data (N=3,489) from a previously published cognitive training study that used the initial nine-item survey, finding that the Attention and Mood subscales were sensitive to the intervention (compared to an active control) to different degrees. In sum, the psychometric properties and extensive normative data set (N=75,019 healthy adults) of the BAMS-7 may make it a useful instrument in assessing real-world attention and mood.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comparison of Pruning During Multi-Step Planning in Depressed and Healthy Individuals 94%
- Context and Domain Matter: The Error-Related Negativity in Peer Presence Predicts Fear of Negative Evaluation, not Global Social Anxiety, in Adolescents 93%
- Using Major Depression Polygenic Risk Scores to Explore the Depressive Symptom Continuum 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote virtual reality assessment elucidates self-blame-related action tendencies in depression 94%
- Clinical properties of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire: Development of a free calculator based on a Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study 93%
- Reward processing in young people with self-harm behaviour 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A One-Arm Pilot Trial of a Telehealth CBT-Based Group Intervention Targeting Transdiagnostic Risk for Emotional Distress 94%
- Mindfulness supports emotional resilience in children during the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Differentiating electrophysiological indices of internal and external performance monitoring: Relationship with perfectionism and locus of control 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in young adulthood 93%
- Strong Genetic Overlaps Between Dimensional and Categorical Models of Bipolar Disorders in a Family Sample 92%
- Impaired Social Learning Predicts Reduced Real-life Motivation in Individuals with Depression: A Computational fMRI Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced loss aversion in subclinical negative symptoms and hypomania 92%
- Quantification of stress and well-being using pulse, speech, and electrodermal data: Study concept and design 90%
- Emotional ego- and altercentric biases in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: Behavioral and neurophysiological evidence 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.