Back

Rapid differentiation of estrogen receptor status in patient biopsy breast cancer aspirates with an optical nanosensor

Gaikwad, P.; Rahman, N.; Ghosh, P.; Ng, D.; Williams, R. M.

2024-04-01 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.03.29.587397 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Breast cancer is a substantial source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is particularly more difficult to treat at later stages, and treatment regimens depend heavily on both staging and the molecular subtype of the tumor. However, both detection and molecular analyses rely on standard imaging and histological method, which are costly, time-consuming, and lack necessary sensitivity/specificity. The estrogen receptor (ER) is, along with the progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor (HER-2), among the primary molecular markers which inform treatment. Patients who are negative for all three markers (triple negative breast cancer, TNBC), have fewer treatment options and a poorer prognosis. Therapeutics for ER+ patients are effective at preventing disease progression, though it is necessary to improve the speed of subtyping and distribution of rapid detection methods. In this work, we designed a near-infrared optical nanosensor using single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) as the transducer and an anti-ER antibody as the recognition element. The nanosensor was evaluated for its response to recombinant ER in buffer and serum prior to evaluation with ER- and ER+ immortal cell lines. We then used a minimal volume of just 10 {micro}L from 26 breast cancer biopsy samples which were aspirated to mimic fine needle aspirates. 20 samples were ER+, while 6 were ER-, representing 13 unique patients. We evaluated the potential of the nanosensor by investigating several SWCNT chiralities through direct incubation or fractionation deployment methods. We found that the nanosensor can differentiate ER-from ER+ patient biopsies through a shift in its center wavelength upon sample addition. This was true regardless of which of the three SWCNT chiralities we observed. Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve analyses determined that the strongest classifier with an AUC of 0.94 was the (7,5) chirality after direct incubation and measurement, and without further processing. We anticipate that further testing and development of this nanosensor may push its utility toward field-deployable, rapid ER subtyping with potential for additional molecular marker profiling.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.2%
2
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.7%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.4%
5
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
7
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
8
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
10
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%