Back

Stacking haplotypes from the Vavilov wheat collection to accelerate breeding for multiple disease resistance

Tong, J.; Tarekegn, Z.; Alahmad, S.; Hickey, L.; Periyannan, S.; Dinglasan, E.; Hayes, B. J. A.

2024-03-31 plant biology
10.1101/2024.03.28.587294 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wheat production is threatened by numerous fungal diseases, but the potential to breed for multiple disease resistance (MDR) mechanisms is yet to be explored. Here, significant global genetic correlations and underlying local genomic regions were identified in the Vavilov wheat diversity panel for six major fungal diseases, including biotrophic leaf rust (LR), yellow rust (YR), stem rust (SR), hemibiotrophic crown rot (CR), and necrotrophic tan spot (TS) and Septoria nodorum blotch (SNB). By adopting haplotype-based local genomic estimated breeding values, derived from an integrated set of 34,899 SNP and DArT markers, we established a novel haplotype catalogue for resistance to the six diseases in over 20 field experiments across Australia and Ethiopia. Haploblocks with high variances of haplotype effects in all environments were identified for three rusts and pleiotropic haploblocks were identified for at least two diseases, with four haploblocks affecting all six diseases. Through simulation we demonstrated that stacking optimal haplotypes for one disease could improve resistance substantially, but indirectly affected resistance for other five diseases, which varied depending on the genetic correlation with the non-target disease trait. On the other hand, our simulation results combining beneficial haplotypes for all diseases increased resistance to LR, YR, SR, CR, TS and SNB, by up to 48.1%, 35.2%, 29.1%, 12.8%, 18.8% and 32.8%, respectively. Overall, our results highlight the genetic potential to improve MDR in wheat. The haploblock-based catalogue with novel forms of resistance provides a useful resource to guide desirable haplotype stacking for breeding future wheat cultivars with MDR.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.4%
2
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
4
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
5
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
7
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
9
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
10
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
14
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
15
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
18
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
21
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
23
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%