Back

Characterizing the expression patterns of short-day flowering genes, the manipulation of their expression using red-far red wavelengths, and the resulting phenotype/ chemotype in Cannabis sativa.

Haiden, S.

2024-03-31 plant biology
10.1101/2024.03.28.587211 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cannabis is a short day (SD) plant whose inflorescences produce valuable medicines. By studying the mechanisms of photoperiodic flowering initiation in cannabis, we may develop new methods of improving cultivation. In SD plants, CONSTANS, which is enhanced by CDL gated proteins that are expressed during short days, acts as a bifunctional regulator of flower inhibition or genesis via FT (florigen). These genes are downstream of phytochrome, which may be activated by horticultural lighting conditions like red (R, 660nm) to far red (FR, 700+nm) wavelength ratios. This study demonstrates that gene expression can be manipulated using high and low R:FR ratios, and characterizes the expression levels of CONSTANS, FT, PRR37, and SOC1 in cannabis over the first 14 short days. It also demonstrates the resulting effect on cannabinoid production and biomass yields.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Plant Direct
○ 95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.1%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Plants
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 13%
5.7%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Planta
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
7
Journal of Experimental Botany
◐ 219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
BMC Plant Biology
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
9
Agronomy
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
10
New Phytologist
○ 346 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.6%
12
Plant Science
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
13
Plant Stress
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
14
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
Environmental and Experimental Botany
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Annals of Botany
◐ 50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
Plant, Cell & Environment
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Biology
○ 45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
19
Physiologia Plantarum
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Genes
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Plant and Cell Physiology
◐ 52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Plant Cell Reports
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
Plant Molecular Biology
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
24
The Plant Genome
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
25
Antioxidants
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
AoB PLANTS
◐ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
27
Gene Reports
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
28
Cells
○ 249 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
29
Plant Methods
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Plant Biology
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.