Learning from Machine Learning: advancing from static to dynamic facial function quantification
Kalavacherla, S.; Mills, M. D.; Greene, J.
Show abstract
ObjectivesWe assess an open-source Python machine learning algorithms efficacy in image and video analysis of facial palsy (FP) patients. MethodsImages and videos of 60 patients with varying FP severities performing standard movements were obtained from MEEI Facial Palsy database. Landmarks generated on images by the open-source algorithm (adapted from OpenCV and Dlib libraries) and Emotrics (standard for two-dimensional FP analysis) were compared. Considering the human eye as the standard for accuracy, three raters marked perceived errors in each algorithms tracking of five facial features. Cumulative error distributions between both algorithms were compared via normalized root mean square error. FP severity and facial feature-specific error rates were compared using ANOVA tests. Raters also analyzed open-source algorithm-generated video landmarks; similar statistical comparisons between open-source algorithms image and video-based analyses were performed. ResultsCumulative error distribution between both algorithms image analyses was most robust for normal function; significant discrepancies were observed in mild/moderate flaccidity and nearly-normal/complete synkinesis. Both algorithms had similar error rates across all facial features (p=0.76) and FP severities (p=0.37). In the open-source algorithms video analysis, mild synkinesis (24.7%) and severe flaccidity (19.7%) had the highest error rates. Comparing image and video analyses generated by the open-source algorithm, video analyses had lower error rates across all FP severities (p<0.001). ConclusionsWe report for the first time the feasibility and relative accuracy of a Python open-source algorithm for dynamic facial landmark tracking in FP videos. The demonstrated superiority of landmark tracking with videos over images can improve objective FP quantification.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Collection of 2429 constrained headshots of 277 volunteers for deep learning 92%
- Evaluation of emotional arousal level and depression severity using the centripetal force derived from voice 91%
- MyoVision-US: an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software for Automated Analysis of Skeletal Muscle Ultrasonography 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal Pain Recognition in Postoperative Patients: A Machine Learning Approach 90%
- Identifying Women at Risk for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Using a Mobile Health Application 88%
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-invasive estimation of intracranial pressureby diffuse optics - a proof-of-concept study 88%
- Objective turning measures improve diagnostic accuracy and relate to real-world mobility/combat readiness in chronic mild traumatic brain injury 87%
- Comparison of common outcome measures for assessing independence in patients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study 87%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.