Back

Distinct Motor Map Characteristics for Biceps and Triceps Muscles in Persons with Chronic Tetraplegia: Implications for Arm Function

Liu, J.; Olaughlin, K.; Forrest, G. F.; Arora, T.; Nemunaitis, G.; Cunningham, D.; Kirshblum, S.; Pundik, S.; Baker, K.; Bryden, A.; Kilgore, K.; Bethoux, F.; Wang, X.; Henzel, M. K.; Brihmat, N.; Bayram, M. B.; Plow, E. B.

2024-03-29 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.03.27.585546 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Following spinal cord injury (SCI), intact neural resources undergo widespread reorganization within the brain. Animal models reveal motor cortical representations devoted to spared muscles above injury expand at the expense of territories occupied by weaker muscles. In this study, we investigated whether motor representations are similarly reorganized between a relatively spared biceps muscle and a weakened triceps muscle in persons with chronic tetraplegia following traumatic cervical SCI in association with upper limb motor function. Twenty-four adults with cervical SCI and 15 able-bodied participants underwent motor mapping using transcranial magnetic stimulation. We determined following map characteristics: area, amplitude (maximal motor evoked potential and volume), and center of gravity. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and motor function (Capabilities of the Upper Extremity Test or CUE-T) were also assessed. Findings reveal that participants with SCI had hyper-excitable biceps maps than triceps, and hyper-excitable biceps maps also compared to biceps maps in able-bodied participants. Higher amplitude of biceps and triceps maps was associated with better motor function (higher CUE-T) and more distal injury (i.e., more spared segments) in persons with SCI. Amplitudes of biceps but not the triceps maps were associated with higher muscle MVCs. In conclusion, over-excitable biceps than triceps map in SCI may represent deafferentation plasticity. For the first time, we demonstrate how map reorganization of spared and weaker muscles in persons with chronic cervical SCI is associated with upper limb motor status. Use-dependent mechanisms may shift neural balance in favor of spared muscles, supporting potential use as response biomarkers in rehabilitation studies. New & NoteworthyOur study reports evidence in humans with cervical SCI that motor representation for the relatively spared muscle becomes hyper-excitable compared to that for the weaker muscle to the extent that hyper-excitability is even higher compared to biceps maps in uninjured individuals. Use-dependent mechanisms likely favor such heightened excitability of spared maps. For the first time, we demonstrate clinical relevance of map excitability in humans with SCI, supporting potential use as a biomarker of recovery.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
2
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
5
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
9
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
12
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
14
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
15
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
18
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
21
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
23
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%