Applying Deep Learning in Heart Failure: Hospital Readmission is Not Like Other Health Quality Metrics
Shepherd, H. M.; Heaton, J.; Marghitu, T.; Bai, L.; Subramanian, M.; Roberts, S.; McGilvray, M.; Pawale, A.; Ewald, G. A.; Cupps, B.; Pasque, M. K.; Foraker, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundEarly identification of heart failure patients at increased risk for near-term adverse outcomes would assist clinicians in efficient resource allocation and improved care. Deep learning can improve identification of these patients. MethodsThis retrospective study examined adult heart failure patients admitted to a tertiary care institution between January 2009 and December 2018. A deep learning model was constructed with a dense input layer, three long short-term memory (LSTM) layers, and a dense hidden layer to cohesively extract features from time-series and non-time-series EHR data. Primary outcomes were all-cause hospital readmission or death within 30 days after hospital discharge. ResultsAmong a final subset of 49,675 heart failure patients, we identified 171,563 hospital admissions described by 330 million EHR data points. There were 22,111 (13%) admissions followed by adverse 30-day outcomes, including 19,122 readmissions (87%) and mortality in 3,330 patients (15%). Our final deep learning model achieved an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.613 and precision-recall (PR) AUC of 0.38. ConclusionsThis EHR-based deep learning model developed from a decade of heart failure care achieved marginal clinical accuracy in predicting very early hospital readmission or death despite previous accurate prediction of 1-year mortality in this large study cohort. These findings suggest that factors unavailable in standard EHR data play pivotal roles in influencing early hospital readmission. Clinical PerspectiveO_ST_ABSWhat is new?C_ST_ABSWe developed an EHR-based deep learning model trained by 330 million data points from one of the largest cohorts of heart failure patients to date. Despite this models highly accurate prediction of long-term outcomes, such as mortality and disease progression, our findings suggest that EHR data alone offers limited predictive power for predicting the short-term outcomes of 30-day hospital readmission or death. What are the clinical implications?Our study supports the notion that hospital readmission, in contrast to other health outcomes, is uniquely driven by additional factors beyond traditional EHR variables. Once identified, incorporation of these determinants into future deep learning models could allow for accurate heart failure risk-stratification at hospital discharge to facilitate more efficient allocation of limited resources to the most vulnerable patients.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) 95%
- External validation of a claims-based model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction class in patients with heart failure 94%
- Evaluating the kidney disease progression using a comprehensive patient profiling algorithm: A hybrid clustering approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 92%
- Use of a Continuous Single Lead Electrocardiogram Analytic to Predict Patient Deterioration Requiring Rapid Response Team Activation 92%
- Detecting QT prolongation From a Single-lead ECG With Deep Learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-Time Electronic Health Record Mortality Prediction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort Study 94%
- Personalizing renal replacement therapy initiation in the intensive care unit: a reinforcement learning-based strategy with external validation on the AKIKI randomized controlled trials 92%
- Validation of a Derived International Patient Severity Algorithm to Support COVID-19 Analytics from Electronic Health Record Data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.