Back

Highlighting Educational Gaps in Hairstyling Practices amongst Dermatologists and Trainees

Araoye, E.; Jamerson, T.; Yin, L.; Lo Sicco, K.; Aguh, C.

2024-03-28 dermatology
10.1101/2024.03.27.24304771 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHairstyling practices are associated with the development and/or exacerbation of various forms of alopecia. Exposure to various hairstyling practices ranges but is often insufficient in current dermatologic textbooks and training curricula. We therefore conducted a survey to establish dermatologists understanding of hairstyling practices, particularly those that have been implicated in alopecia. MethodsA 34-item anonymous, electronic survey was distributed by email to 291 board-certified dermatologists and dermatology residents across the US between August 2020 and February 2021. Responses were rated on a 10-point scale to identify physician confidence in various styling practices ResultsBlack providers were more confident in both the knowledge and counseling of all hair practices (chemical straightening, heat styling, braiding, weaving, and wigs) compared to non-Black providers (p <0.001), with the exception of counseling patients on hair dyes for which no significant difference was found (p=0.337). Female providers were only more likely to indicate confidence in knowledge regarding different heat styling methods and hair dyes, and counseling of heat styling methods compared to male providers (OR 15.72, p<0.001; OR 2.47, p=0.022; OR 3.78, p=0.001 respectively) across all hair practices surveyed. Overall, 63.8% of providers reported that the majority of their knowledge on hair practices was from personal experience as opposed to formal training. LimitationsThis survey is limited by its response rate and the inability to characterize non-responders due to anonymity. ConclusionOur study highlights educational gaps in dermatologic training on hair practices, especially those more common among Black patients. Interestingly, the majority of provider knowledge came from personal experience rather than dermatologic training emphasizing the need for formalized curricula to enhance understanding among all dermatology providers.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
2
British Journal of Dermatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.4%
3
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.1%
5
JID Innovations
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.8%
6
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.8%
7
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
8
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
9
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
10
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
11
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
12
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
13
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
18
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 81%
0.5%
20
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
21
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%