Back

Evaluating Species at Risk in Data-Limited Fisheries: A Comprehensive Productivity-Susceptibility Analysis of the Most Traded Marine Aquarium Fish

Baillargeon, G. A.; Wynn, A. A.; Baldisimo, J. G. P.; Tlusty, M. F.; Rhyne, A. L.

2024-03-29 ecology
10.1101/2024.03.26.586872 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The marine aquarium trade is a significant global industry harvesting millions of live coral reef fishes annually. Wild-caught fish dominate public and private aquaria markets in the USA and Europe, supporting fisher livelihoods in the Indo-Pacific. This diverse and species-rich trade is considered data-limited, creating barriers to quantify the sustainability of this fishery to the net benefit of the coral reef socio-ecological system. We present a revised and expanded productivity-susceptibility analysis (PSA) framework to assess the vulnerability to overharvesting of the top 258 traded species, an estimated 92.5% of all import volume into the USA in 2011. Vulnerability was calculated based on various productivity and susceptibility factors, tailored to the unique life-history and fishery selectivity characteristics of the marine aquarium trade. We present novel factors that improve model accuracy, methods to overcome missing data for individual factors, and apply an improved Gaussian mixture model clustering algorithm to objectively classify species as least, moderately, or most vulnerable. Our results show that an overwhelming 85% of species evaluated fall into the least or moderately vulnerable classification, with the remaining species designated as high priority for localized assessment and management initiatives. A comparative case study between our PSA and the popular FishBase Vulnerability assessment illustrates how it is ill-suited to handle data limitations of non-food fishes. The results of our PSA, at a species and family level, provide useful information to stakeholders and serves as a robust and accessible risk assessment tool to prioritize species for management based on their vulnerability scores.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
2
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
6
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.2%
8
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
9
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
10
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Journal of Fish Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.4%
18
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
20
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
21
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
27
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%