Quality of Care at childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings of the IMAgiNE EURO study in Belgium
Galle, A.; D'hauwers, S.; Berghman, H.; Vaerewijck, N.; Valente, E. P.; Mariani, I.; Bomben, A.; Vedove, S. d.; Lazzerini, M.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo examine quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around childbirth in facilities in Belgium during the COVID-19 pandemic and trends over time. DesignA cross-sectional observational study. SettingData of the IMAgiNE EURO study in Belgium. Participants Women giving birth in a Belgian facility from March 1, 2020, to May 1, 2023, responded a validated online questionnaire based on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures organised in four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of resources, and organizational changes related to COVID-19. Primary and secondary outcome measuresQuantile regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of QMNC; trends over time were tested with the Mann-Kendall test. Results897 women were included in the analysis, 67%(n=601) with spontaneous vaginal birth, 13.3%(n=119) with instrumental vaginal birth and 19.7%(n=177) with cesarean section. We found high QMNC scores but also specific gaps in all domains of QMNC. On provision of care, 21.0%(n=166) of women who experienced labor and 14.7%(n=26) of women with a cesarean reported inadequate pain relief; 64.7%(n=74) of women with an instrumental birth reported fundal pressure and 72.3% (n=86) reported that forceps or vacuum cup was used without their consent. On experience of care, 31.1%(n=279) reported unclear communication, 32.9%(n=295) reported that they were not involved in choices,11.5%(n=104) stated not being treated with dignity and 8.1%(n=73) experienced abuse. Related to resources, almost half of the women reported an inadequate number of healthcare professionals (46.2%, n=414). The multivariable analyses showed significantly lower QMNC scores for women with an instrumental vaginal birth. Over time there was a significant increase in QMNC score for experience of care and key organizational changes due to COVID-19. Conclusions and relevanceAlthough overall QMNC scores were high, findings also suggest gaps in QMNC. Underlying causes of these gaps should be explored to design appropriate interventions and policies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 97%
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 95%
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Making maternity and neonatal care personalised in the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Babies Born Better Survey in the UK and the Netherlands 96%
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 96%
- Trends, wealth inequalities and the role of the private sector in caesarean section in the Middle East and North Africa: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of population-based surveys 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives, and trainees 97%
- Out-of-hospital births and the experiences of emergency ambulance clinicians and birthing parents: A scoping review of the literature 96%
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 97%
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 96%
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic on coverage of RMNH interventions in Ethiopia 94%
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of published pregnancy cases 94%
- Understanding care-seeking of pregnant women from underserved groups: A systematic review and meta-ethnography 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.