Back

Bacterial defenses and their trade-off with growth are not ubiquitous but depend on ecological contexts

Liu, Z.-L.; Liu, J.; Niu, D.-K.

2024-03-24 microbiology
10.1101/2024.03.24.586452 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacteriophages, also known as bacterial viruses, significantly influence microbial ecosystems, driving bacteria to evolve diverse antiviral defense mechanisms. This study explores the intricate relationship between bacterial defenses and growth rates across diverse ecological contexts. Our investigation reveals that bacteria lacking defenses exhibit prolonged doubling times. Integrating phylogenetic eigenvectors into the ecological feature matrix, we employed a phylogenetic random forest model to identify key ecological features influencing defense presence and abundance. Further phylogenetic regressions unveil nuanced dependencies of bacterial defenses on specific environmental factors, challenging assumptions of a universal defense system distribution and underscoring reliance on subtle ecological cues. Notably, symbiotic and endosymbiotic bacteria often exhibit reduced defense systems and negative correlations between defense system abundance and the minimal doubling time. Conversely, free-living and motile bacteria show significant positive correlations between minimal doubling time and defense system abundance. Moreover, we highlight the pivotal role of ecological variables like habitat specificity and nutrient availability in shaping bacterial growth rates and defense mechanisms. Our findings underscore the complexity of microbial interactions and stress the need to consider ecological context in understanding defense strategies. We propose that trade-offs between growth and defense are ubiquitous due to sporadically inefficient optimization of limited resources, particularly in populations with small effective sizes, where both mechanisms may weaken concurrently due to genetic drift. This challenges traditional notions of trade-offs and underscores the impact of ecological context on microbial strategies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.