Back

Health outcome priorities of people with multiple long-term conditions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Survey data from the UK

Sathanapally, H.; Chudasama, Y.; Zaccardi, F.; Rizzi, A.; Seidu, S.; Khunti, K.

2024-03-26 primary care research
10.1101/2024.03.24.24304807 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe outcome prioritisation tool (OPT) is a simple tool to ascertain the health outcome priorities of people with MLTC. Use of this tool in people aged under 65 years with MLTC has not previously been investigated. This study investigated the feasibility of using the OPT in people with MLTC aged 45 years or above, in a multi-ethnic primary-care setting, to describe the health outcome priorities of people with MLTC by age, clusters of long-term conditions and demographic factors, and to investigate any differences in prioritisation in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsThis was a multi-centre cross-sectional study using a questionnaire for online self-completion by people aged 45 years or above with MLTC in 19 primary care settings across the East Midlands, UK. Participants were asked to complete the OPT twice, first from their current perspective and second from their recollection of their priorities prior to COVID-19. ResultsThe questionnaire was completed by 2,454 people with MLTC. The majority of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the OPT was easy to complete, relevant to their healthcare and will be useful in communicating priorities to their doctor. Summary scores for the whole cohort of participants showed Keeping Alive and Maintaining Independence receiving the highest scores. Statistically significant differences in prioritisation by age, clusters of long-term conditions and employment status were observed, with respondents aged over 65 most likely to prioritise Maintaining independence, and respondents aged under 65 most likely to prioritise Keeping alive. There were no differences before or after COVID-19, or by ethnicity. ConclusionsThe OPT is feasible and acceptable for use to elicit the health outcome priorities of people with MLTC across both middle-aged and older age groups and in a UK setting. Individual factors could influence the priorities of people with MLTC and must be considered by clinicians during consultations. HIGHLIGHTSO_LISurvey data from 2,454 patients with MLTC showed that keeping alive and maintaining independence were the top first-choice priorities from the health outcome priorities tool (OPT). C_LIO_LIThe health outcomes priorities differed by socio-demographics and clusters of long-term conditions. C_LIO_LIThere were no differences in health outcomes priorities before and during COVID-19. C_LIO_LIOPT is easy and acceptable to implement in a health care setting in a broad patient group. C_LIO_LITranslation of the OPT into different languages is recommended to address any potential language barrier for people with MLTC completing the OPT C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
14.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
4
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.7%
6
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
7
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
9
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
13
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
16
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%