Health outcome priorities of people with multiple long-term conditions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Survey data from the UK
Sathanapally, H.; Chudasama, Y.; Zaccardi, F.; Rizzi, A.; Seidu, S.; Khunti, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe outcome prioritisation tool (OPT) is a simple tool to ascertain the health outcome priorities of people with MLTC. Use of this tool in people aged under 65 years with MLTC has not previously been investigated. This study investigated the feasibility of using the OPT in people with MLTC aged 45 years or above, in a multi-ethnic primary-care setting, to describe the health outcome priorities of people with MLTC by age, clusters of long-term conditions and demographic factors, and to investigate any differences in prioritisation in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsThis was a multi-centre cross-sectional study using a questionnaire for online self-completion by people aged 45 years or above with MLTC in 19 primary care settings across the East Midlands, UK. Participants were asked to complete the OPT twice, first from their current perspective and second from their recollection of their priorities prior to COVID-19. ResultsThe questionnaire was completed by 2,454 people with MLTC. The majority of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the OPT was easy to complete, relevant to their healthcare and will be useful in communicating priorities to their doctor. Summary scores for the whole cohort of participants showed Keeping Alive and Maintaining Independence receiving the highest scores. Statistically significant differences in prioritisation by age, clusters of long-term conditions and employment status were observed, with respondents aged over 65 most likely to prioritise Maintaining independence, and respondents aged under 65 most likely to prioritise Keeping alive. There were no differences before or after COVID-19, or by ethnicity. ConclusionsThe OPT is feasible and acceptable for use to elicit the health outcome priorities of people with MLTC across both middle-aged and older age groups and in a UK setting. Individual factors could influence the priorities of people with MLTC and must be considered by clinicians during consultations. HIGHLIGHTSO_LISurvey data from 2,454 patients with MLTC showed that keeping alive and maintaining independence were the top first-choice priorities from the health outcome priorities tool (OPT). C_LIO_LIThe health outcomes priorities differed by socio-demographics and clusters of long-term conditions. C_LIO_LIThere were no differences in health outcomes priorities before and during COVID-19. C_LIO_LIOPT is easy and acceptable to implement in a health care setting in a broad patient group. C_LIO_LITranslation of the OPT into different languages is recommended to address any potential language barrier for people with MLTC completing the OPT C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in General Practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives 94%
- Primary care transformation in Scotland: a comparison two cross-sectional national surveys of general practitioners’ views in 2018 and 2023 93%
- Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 95%
- STIMULATE-ICP-CAREINEQUAL - Defining usual care and examining inequalities in Long Covid support: protocol for a mixed-methods study (part of STIMULATE-ICP: Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways) 94%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 95%
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 94%
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 94%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 94%
- Patient characteristics associated with clinically coded long COVID: an OpenSAFELY study using electronic health records 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reclaiming health: a qualitative, explorative study of long covid recovery journeys involving mind-body approaches. 92%
- Early Evidence and Predictors of Mental Distress of Adults One Month in the COVID-19 Epidemic in Brazil 89%
- The individual and combined associations of depression and socioeconomic status with risk of major cardiovascular events: a prospective cohort study 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.